Patterns of helping effort in co-operatively breeding banded mongooses (Mungos mungo)

被引:43
作者
Cant, MA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Zool, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, England
关键词
helping behaviour; co-operation; babysitting; social evolution; Mungos mungo;
D O I
10.1017/S0952836902003011
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
In most co-operative breeding species, some individuals contribute much more to helping behaviour than others. The most well-established explanation of such variation is based on kin selection and suggests that, in the absence of detectable differences in relatedness, individuals who suffer lower costs for a given level of help should contribute more. Differences in helping effort between dominance/sex categories were investigated in co-operatively breeding banded mongooses Mungos mungo in Uganda. The most conspicuous form of help in this species is provided by individuals who babysit offspring at the den while the rest of the pack goes off to forage. Across eight groups, the survival rate of pups increased with the average number of babysitters guarding them, consistent with the hypothesis that helpers benefit the brood that they guard. There was no difference between dominant males, subordinate males and breeding females in total contributions to babysitting. Subordinate males, however, contributed more to babysitting in the mornings, which were the longest and presumably the most energetically expensive sessions of the day. In six litters in one well-studied pack, dominant males and breeding females reduced their contribution to babysitting for the period that females were in oestrus. By contrast, subordinate males increased their contribution to become the main babysitters during this time. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that, where helping conflicts with breeding, individuals with little chance of direct reproduction can help at a lower fitness cost than those with a high probability of successful reproduction.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 121
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Serengeti II: dynamics, management, and conservation of an ecosystem
[2]   Experimental manipulation of brood reduction and parental care in cooperatively breeding white-winged choughs [J].
Boland, CRJ ;
Heinsohn, R ;
Cockburn, A .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1997, 66 (05) :683-691
[3]   Helping effort and future fitness in cooperative animal societies [J].
Cant, MA ;
Field, J .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2001, 268 (1479) :1959-1964
[4]   Eviction and dispersal in co-operatively breeding banded mongooses (Mungos mungo) [J].
Cant, MA ;
Otali, E ;
Mwanguhya, F .
JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2001, 254 :155-162
[5]   Social control of reproduction in banded mongooses [J].
Cant, MA .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2000, 59 :147-158
[6]   A model for the evolution of reproductive skew without reproductive suppression [J].
Cant, MA .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1998, 55 :163-169
[7]   Costly young and reproductive skew in animal societies [J].
Cant, MA ;
Johnstone, RA .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 1999, 10 (02) :178-184
[8]   Costs of cooperative behaviour in suricates (Suricata suricatta) [J].
Clutton-Brock, TH ;
Gaynor, D ;
Kansky, R ;
MacColl, ADC ;
McIlrath, G ;
Chadwick, P ;
Brotherton, PNM ;
O'Riain, JM ;
Manser, M ;
Skinner, JD .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1998, 265 (1392) :185-190
[9]   Individual contributions to babysitting in a cooperative mongoose, Suricata suricatta [J].
Clutton-Brock, TH ;
Brotherton, PNM ;
O'Riain, MJ ;
Griffin, AS ;
Gaynor, D ;
Sharpe, L ;
Kansky, R ;
Manser, MB ;
McIlrath, GM .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2000, 267 (1440) :301-305
[10]  
Creel Scott R., 1997, P150