Extracolonic findings at CT colonography: Evaluation of prevalence and cost in a screening population

被引:94
作者
Gluecker, TM
Johnson, CD
Wilson, LA
MacCarty, RL
Welch, TJ
Vanness, DJ
Ahlquist, DA
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiol, Rochester, MN 55902 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Hlth Care Policy & Res, Rochester, MN 55902 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Internal Med, Rochester, MN 55902 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1053/gast.2003.50158
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background & Aims: To assess the prevalence and spectrum of extracolonic findings in a screening population undergoing computed tomography colonography (CTC), and to evaluate the short-term direct medical costs incurred from subsequent radiologic follow-up evaluation. Methods: Six hundred and eighty-one asymptomatic patients undergoing colonoscopy screening consented to a CTC examination. Extracolonic CT findings were classified into high, medium, and low importance. Clinical and radiologic follow-up, missed lesions, and outcomes were assessed by chart review (time interval, 410-1513 days; median, 913 days). Short-term direct medical costs of radiologic follow-up were determined based on Medicare 2002 reimbursement rates. Results: Extracolonic findings were found commonly. These were categorized as high clinical importance in 71 (10%) individuals, as medium importance in :183 individuals (27%), and as low importance in 341 individuals (50%). Subsequent medical or surgical interventions resulted from these findings in 9 of the 681 patients (1.3%). Costs of subsequent radiologic follow-up studies were calculated as $23,380.59 (average added costs per CTC examination $34.33). Conclusions: CTC commonly detects extracolonic findings that can be considered clinically important when applied to an asymptomatic screening population. Although such incidental findings add benefit to the screening intervention, moderate incremental costs are incurred based on additional radiologic procedures generated during short-term follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:911 / 916
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] CANNONALBRIGHT LA, 1994, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V89, P827
  • [2] DISARIO JA, 1991, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V86, P941
  • [3] Edwards JT, 2001, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V96, P3009
  • [4] A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps
    Fenlon, HM
    Nunes, DP
    Schroy, PC
    Barish, MA
    Clarke, PD
    Ferrucci, JT
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (20) : 1496 - 1503
  • [5] Optimization of CT colonography technique: Prospective trial in 180 patients
    Fletcher, JG
    Johnson, CD
    Welch, TJ
    MacCarty, RL
    Ahlquist, DA
    Reed, JE
    Harmsen, WS
    Wilson, LA
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2000, 216 (03) : 704 - 711
  • [6] Gold MR, 1996, COST EFFECTIVENESS H
  • [7] CT colonography: Single-versus multi-detector row imaging
    Hara, AK
    Johnson, CD
    MacCarty, RL
    Welch, TJ
    McCollough, CH
    Harmen, WS
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2001, 219 (02) : 461 - 465
  • [8] Incidental extracolonic findings at CT colonography
    Hara, AK
    Johnson, CD
    MacCarty, RL
    Welch, TJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2000, 215 (02) : 353 - 357
  • [9] LAVE JR, 1994, MED CARE, V32, pJS77
  • [10] PSYCHOLOGICAL SIDE-EFFECTS OF BREAST-CANCER SCREENING
    LERMAN, C
    TROCK, B
    RIMER, BK
    JEPSON, C
    BRODY, D
    BOYCE, A
    [J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 10 (04) : 259 - 267