On assessing individual differences in Rumination on sadness

被引:252
作者
Conway, M
Csank, PAR
Holm, SL
Blake, CK
机构
[1] Concordia Univ, Dept Psychol PY170, Montreal, PQ H4B 1R6, Canada
[2] Concordia Univ, Ctr Res Human Dev, Montreal, PQ H4B 1R6, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1207/S15327752JPA7503_04
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The Rumination on Sadness Scale (RSS), an individual-difference measure of rumination on sadness, was developed as an alternative to the Ruminative Responses scale of the Response Styles Questionnaire (RRRSQ; Nolen-Hoeksema & Morrow, 1991). Research has shown the RRRSQ to consist of multiple, not highly intercorrelated factors; only 1 factor explicitly addresses rumination. Ln Study 1, a I-factor solution to a principal components analysis was shown to hold for responses to the RSS. The RSS was also shown to be reliable. in Study 2, convergent and discriminant validity of the RSS were assessed. in Study 3, individuals with high RSS scores exhibited more distress regarding current concerns with the introduction of a delay period (to allow them to ruminate) after a sad mood induction.
引用
收藏
页码:404 / 425
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条