Impact of spiral computed tomography on the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in a community hospital setting

被引:10
作者
Ost, D
Khanna, D
Shah, R
Hall, CS
Shah, S
Lesser, M
Fein, AM
机构
[1] N Shore Univ Hosp, Dept Pulm & Crit Care Med, Manhasset, NY 11030 USA
[2] NYU, Sch Med, Div Biostat, New York, NY USA
[3] NYU, Sch Med, Div Radiol, New York, NY USA
[4] NYU, Sch Med, Dept Pulm & Crit Care Med, New York, NY USA
[5] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Med, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
关键词
computed tomography scan; cost-benefit analysis; pulmonary embolism; venous thromboembolism; ventilation-perfusion scan;
D O I
10.1159/000080628
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: While the optimal role of spiral CT angiography (CTA) in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) remains controversial, this technology is already being widely utilized in the community setting. Objectives: To assess the impact CTA has had on angiography utilization rates and the overall diagnostic rate of PE. Methods: All patients evaluated for PE during a 4-year period were studied. PE was defined as either a high-probability V/Q scan, a positive conventional angiogram, or a CTA with emboli in the segmental or larger pulmonary vessels. Diagnostic rates of PE per 1,000 hospital admissions were determined and analyzed for time periods before and after the introduction of CTA. CT reports were compared with their concurrent chest radiograph (CXR) reports and additional findings that were not apparent on CXR were abstracted. Results: The diagnostic rate of PE per 1,000 hospital admissions was 1.8 prior to the introduction of CTA and increased to 2.8 per 1,000 admissions after the introduction of CTA (p<0.0001). Total costs for diagnostic testing per PE diagnosis made went from $2,518 to $2,572. While the number of PE diagnosed by V/Q scan remained constant, the number of PE diagnosed by conventional angiography decreased while the number diagnosed by CTA increased. In patients with intermediate probability V/Q scan results, the percentage of patients receiving subsequent angiography (conventional or CTA) increased from 17 to 26% (p=0.043). When conventional angiography was performed, CT imaging of the chest still had to be ordered for other reasons 38% of the time. Additional information was obtained in 78% of cases when CTA was performed. Conclusions: Increased utilization of CTA was associated with an increase in angiography utilization rates and diagnostic rates of PE, was cost effective, and often provided additional, useful, and unanticipated diagnostic information. Copyright (C) 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:450 / 457
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[21]   USE OF PULMONARY ANGIOGRAPHY FOR SUSPECTED PULMONARY-EMBOLISM - INFLUENCE OF SCINTIGRAPHIC DIAGNOSIS [J].
SOSTMAN, HD ;
RAVIN, CE ;
SULLIVAN, DC ;
MILLS, SR ;
GLICKMAN, MG ;
DORFMAN, GS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1982, 139 (04) :673-677
[22]   COMPLICATIONS AND VALIDITY OF PULMONARY ANGIOGRAPHY IN ACUTE PULMONARY-EMBOLISM [J].
STEIN, PD ;
ATHANASOULIS, C ;
ALVAI, A ;
GREENSPAN, RH ;
HALES, CA ;
SALTZMAN, HA ;
VREIM, CE ;
TERRIN, ML ;
WEG, JG .
CIRCULATION, 1992, 85 (02) :462-468
[23]   Opinions regarding the diagnosis and management of venous thromboembolic disease [J].
Stein, PD ;
Goldhaber, SZ ;
Gottschalk, A ;
Hull, RD ;
Hyers, TM ;
Leeper, KV ;
Moser, KM ;
Pineo, GF ;
Raskob, G ;
Saltzman, HA ;
Sostman, D ;
Tapson, VF ;
Weg, JG .
CHEST, 1998, 113 (02) :499-504
[24]   PULMONARY-EMBOLISM - DIAGNOSIS WITH CONTRAST-ENHANCED ELECTRON-BEAM CT AND COMPARISON WITH PULMONARY ANGIOGRAPHY [J].
TEIGEN, CL ;
MAUS, TP ;
SHEEDY, PF ;
STANSON, AW ;
JOHNSON, CM ;
BREEN, JF ;
MCKUSICK, MA .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 194 (02) :313-319
[25]  
van Strijen MJL, 2003, ANN INTERN MED, V138, P307, DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-138-4-200302180-00009
[26]   Role of spiral volumetric computed tomographic scanning in the assessment of patients with clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism and an abnormal ventilation perfusion lung scan [J].
vanRossum, AB ;
Treurniet, FEE ;
Kieft, GJ ;
Smith, SJ ;
SchepersBok, R .
THORAX, 1996, 51 (01) :23-28
[27]  
VREIM CE, 1990, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V263, P2753
[28]  
WORSLEY DF, 1995, J NUCL MED, V36, P2380