Providing affordable family housing and reducing residential segregation by income - A systematic review

被引:95
作者
Anderson, LM
St Charles, J
Fullilove, MT
Scrimshaw, SC
Fielding, JE
Normand, J
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Community Guide Branch, Div Prevent Res & Analyt Methods, Epidemiol Program Off, Atlanta, GA 30341 USA
[2] Task Force Community Prevnet Serv, New York, NY USA
[3] Columbia Univ, New York, NY USA
[4] Task Force Community Prevent Serv, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Univ Chicago, Sch Publ Hlth, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[6] Los Angeles Dept Hlth Serv, Task Force Community Prevent Serv, Los Angeles, CA USA
[7] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Publ Hlth, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[8] NIDA, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00656-6
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The inadequate supply of affordable housing for low-income families and the increasing spatial segregation of some households by income, race, ethnicity, or social class into unsafe neighborhoods are among the most prevalent community health concerns related to family housing. When affordable housing is not available to low-income households, family resources needed for food, medical or dental care, and other necessities are diverted to housing costs. Two housing programs intended to provide affordable housing and, concurrently, reduce the residential segregation of low-income families into unsafe neighborhoods of concentrated poverty, are reviewed: the creation of mixed-income housing developments and the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Section 8 Rental Voucher Program. The effectiveness of mixed-income housing developments could not be ascertained by this systematic review because of a lack of comparative research. Scientific evidence was sufficient to conclude that rental voucher programs improve household safety as measured by reduced exposure to crimes against person and property and decreased neighborhood social disorder. Effectiveness of rental voucher programs on youth health risk behaviors, mental health status, and physical health status could not be determined because too few studies of adequate design and execution reported these outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 67
页数:21
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [21] HOGAN JB, 1985, URBAN RESOURCES, V2, P9
  • [22] IANNOTTA JG, 2002, EQUALITY OPPORTUNITY
  • [23] Institute of Medicine, 1988, HOM HLTH HUM NEEDS
  • [24] JAROGWSKY P, 1997, POVERTY PLACE GHETTO
  • [25] Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University, 2001, STAT NAT HOUS 2001
  • [26] Kasarda J.D., 1993, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V4, P253, DOI [10.1080/10511482.1993.9521135, DOI 10.1080/10511482.1993.9521135]
  • [27] Joblessness and poverty in America's central cities: Causes and policy prescriptions
    Kasarda, JD
    Ting, KF
    [J]. HOUSING POLICY DEBATE, 1996, 7 (02) : 387 - 419
  • [28] KATZ LF, 2000, EARLY IMPACTS MOVING
  • [29] KATZ LF, 2002, MOVING OPPORTUNITY B
  • [30] KATZ LF, 2002, EARLY IMPACTS MOVING