Comparison of different multicriteria evaluation methods for the Red Bluff diversion dam

被引：73

作者：

Mahmoud, MR

Garcia, LA ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Chem & Bioresource Engn, Integrated Decis Support Grp, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA

[2] Minist Publ Works & Water Resources, Informat Ctr, Cairo, Egypt

[3] Minist Publ Works & Water Resources, DSS, Cairo, Egypt

来源：

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE | 2000年 / 15卷 / 05期

关键词：

mathematical modeling; water management; multi-criteria evaluation; optimization; multipurpose reservoir; alternative selection and; decision support system;

D O I：

10.1016/S1364-8152(00)00025-6

中图分类号：

TP39 [计算机的应用];

学科分类号：

081203 ; 0835 ;

摘要：

A computer program was created to conduct a comparative study of five Multi-Criteria Evaluation Methods (MCEMs), each of which is capable of evaluating alternatives in a resource management setting. The MCEMs included Weighted Average (WA), Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE II), Compromise Programming (CP), ELimination and Choice Translating REality (ELECTRE II). and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). In this study, each of the MCEMs is applied to an array of different management alternatives for andromodous fish migration through the Red Bluff Diversion Dam (RBDD) along the Sacramento River in California. Results are evaluated and MCEMs are ranked based on (1) the consistency of results, (2) thr amount of interaction required by the user and (3) the degree of usability by technical and nontechnical professionals. It is concluded that WA is the method of choice when applied within the boundaries of the present study. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：471 / 478

页数：8

共 21 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 1980, RESOURCE ALLOCATION

[2]

Brans J.P., 1984, OPERATIONAL RES, P477, DOI DOI 10.1007/0-387-23081-5_

[3] HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS - THE PROMETHEE METHOD [J].