Big Science and Big Data in Biology: From the International Geophysical Year through the International Biological Program to the Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network, 1957-Present

被引:115
作者
Aronova, Elena [1 ]
Baker, Karen S. [2 ]
Oreskes, Naomi [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Hist, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Scripps Inst Oceanog, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Provost Coll 6, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Big Science; International Geophysical Year (IGY); International Biological Program (IBP); Roger Revelle; data-driven research; data management; UNITED-STATES; HUMAN GENOME; ECOSYSTEMS; SECURITY; LESSONS; POLICY; EARTH;
D O I
10.1525/hsns.2010.40.2.183
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
This paper discusses the historical connections between two large-scale undertakings that became exemplars for worldwide data-driven scientific initiatives after World War II: the International Geophysical Year (1957-1958) and the International Biological Program (1964-1974). The International Biological Program was seen by its planners as a means to promote Big Science in ecology. As the term Big Science gained currency in the 1960s, the Manhattan Project and the national space program became paradigmatic examples, but the International Geophysical Year provided scientists with an alternative model: a synoptic collection of observational data on a global scale. This new, potentially complementary model of Big Science encompassed the field practices of ecologists and suggested a model for the natural historical sciences to achieve the stature and reach of the experimental physical sciences. However, the program encountered difficulties when the institutional structures, research methodologies, and data management implied by the Big Science mode of research collided with the epistemic goals, practices, and assumptions of many ecologists. By 1974, when the program ended, many participants viewed it as a failure. However, this failed program transformed into the Long-Term Ecological Research program. Historical analysis suggests that many of the original incentives of the program ( the emphasis on Big Data and the implementation of the organizational structure of Big Science in biological projects) were in fact realized by the program's visionaries and its immediate investigators. While the program failed to follow the exact model of the International Geophysical Year, it ultimately succeeded in providing a renewed legitimacy for synoptic data collection in biology. It also helped to create a new mode of contemporary science of the Long Term Ecological Research (LTER Network), used by ecologists today.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 224
页数:42
相关论文
共 105 条
[31]  
EGAN M, 2007, BARRY COMMONER SCI S, P103
[32]   ECOSYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND POPULATION BIOLOGY - LESSONS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF COMMUNITY ECOLOGY [J].
FOIN, TC ;
JAIN, SK .
BIOSCIENCE, 1977, 27 (08) :532-538
[33]   BEHIND QUANTUM-ELECTRONICS - NATIONAL-SECURITY AS BASIS FOR PHYSICAL RESEARCH IN THE UNITED-STATES, 1940-1960 [J].
FORMAN, P .
HISTORICAL STUDIES IN THE PHYSICAL AND BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1987, 18 :149-229
[34]  
FOSBERG FR, 1964, COMMUNICATION 0401
[35]  
FOSBERG FR, 1964, COMMUNICATION 0404
[36]   CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE LONG-TERM ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PROGRAM - AN EXPANDED NETWORK OF SCIENTISTS, SITES, AND PROGRAMS CAN PROVIDE CRUCIAL COMPARATIVE ANALYSES [J].
FRANKLIN, JF ;
BLEDSOE, CS ;
CALLAHAN, JT .
BIOSCIENCE, 1990, 40 (07) :509-523
[37]  
Galison Peter., 1997, Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics
[38]  
GALLER SR, 1960, COMMUNICATION 0308
[39]   PUGWASH INTEREST IN COMMUNICATIONS [J].
GLASS, B .
SCIENCE, 1968, 159 (3821) :1328-&
[40]  
Golley F. B., 1993, A History of the Ecosystem Concept in Ecology