The validity and reliability of pain measures in adults with cancer

被引:348
作者
Jensen, MP
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Rehabil Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Med Ctr, Ctr Multidisciplinary Pain, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
cancer; cancer pain; pain assessment;
D O I
10.1054/jpai.2003.1
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
To be most useful, clinical trials of cancer pain treatments should use pain measures that are both reliable and valid. A great variety of measures are now available that may be used to assess cancer pain. However, there are not yet any clear guidelines for selecting one or more measures over the others. The purpose of this article is to summarize the evidence concerning the validity and reliability of cancer pain measures. One hundred sixty-four articles were identified that provided psychometric data of pain measures among patients with cancer. The results indicate that commonly used single-item ratings of pain intensity are all valid and adequately reliable as measures of pain intensity, although some scales appear to be easier for patients with cancer to understand and to use than others. Multiple-item measures of pain intensity are reliable, but evidence concerning their validity is lacking. There is a paucity of research examining the psychometric properties of measures of cancer pain interference, pain relief, pain site, the temporal aspects of pain, and pain quality. This lack of evidence limits the conclusions that may be drawn concerning the reliability and validity of these other pain measures. Composite measures that combine ratings of pain intensity and pain interference into a single score appear to be both valid and reliable for describing patient populations, although their usefulness in clinical trials may be limited because they can obscure the contributions of intensity and interference to the total score. Proxy measures of cancer pain (pain ratings made by someone other than the patient) may be useful when patients are not able to provide pain ratings, but they should not be used as replacements for patient ratings when patient self-report measures are available. The discussion includes specific recommendations for selecting from among the available pain measures, as well as recommendations for future research into the assessment of cancer pain. (C) 2003 by the American Pain Society.
引用
收藏
页码:2 / 21
页数:20
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY [J].
AARONSON, NK ;
AHMEDZAI, S ;
BERGMAN, B ;
BULLINGER, M ;
CULL, A ;
DUEZ, NJ ;
FILIBERTI, A ;
FLECHTNER, H ;
FLEISHMAN, SB ;
DEHAES, JCJM ;
KAASA, S ;
KLEE, M ;
OSOBA, D ;
RAZAVI, D ;
ROFE, PB ;
SCHRAUB, S ;
SNEEUW, K ;
SULLIVAN, M ;
TAKEDA, F .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) :365-376
[2]  
American Educational Research Association American Psychological Association National Council on Measurement in Education, 1999, NAT COUNC MEAS ED ST
[3]  
[Anonymous], WHO TECH REP SER
[4]  
Cleeland C. S., 1994, Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore, V23, P129
[5]   The measurement of symptoms in young children with cancer: The validation of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale in children aged 7-12 [J].
Collins, JJ ;
Devine, TD ;
Dick, GS ;
Johnson, EA ;
Kilham, HA ;
Pinkerton, CR ;
Stevens, MM ;
Thaler, HT ;
Portenoy, RK .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2002, 23 (01) :10-16
[6]   The measurement of symptoms in children with cancer [J].
Collins, JJ ;
Byrnes, ME ;
Dunkel, IJ ;
Lapin, J ;
Nadel, T ;
Thaler, HT ;
Polyak, T ;
Rapkin, B ;
Portenoy, RK .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2000, 19 (05) :363-377
[7]   Implementing guidelines for cancer pain management: Results of a randomized controlled clinical trial [J].
Du Pen, SL ;
Du Pen, AR ;
Polissar, N ;
Hansberry, J ;
Kraybill, BM ;
Stillman, M ;
Panke, J ;
Everly, R ;
Syrjala, K .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (01) :361-370
[8]   Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale [J].
Farrar, JT ;
Young, JP ;
LaMoreaux, L ;
Werth, JL ;
Poole, RM .
PAIN, 2001, 94 (02) :149-158
[9]   Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures [J].
Farrar, JT ;
Portenoy, RK ;
Berlin, JA ;
Kinman, JL ;
Strom, BL .
PAIN, 2000, 88 (03) :287-294
[10]   Development and preliminary validation of a pain measure specific to neuropathic pain: The neuropathic pain scale [J].
Galer, BS ;
Jensen, MP .
NEUROLOGY, 1997, 48 (02) :332-338