A comparison of ten USEPA approved total coliform/E-coli tests

被引:63
作者
Olstadt, Jeremy
Schauer, James Jay
Standridge, Jon
Kluender, Sharon
机构
[1] Wisconsin State Lab Hyg, Water Bacteriol Dept, Madison, WI 53707 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Environm Chem & Technol Program, Madison, WI USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Water Bacteriol, Wisconsin State Lab Hyg, Madison, WI 53718 USA
关键词
Aeromonas spp; enzyme-based test; E; coli; groundwater; total coliform;
D O I
10.2166/wh.2007.008b
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Since 2002, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has approved ten enzyme-based total coliform and E. coli detection tests for examination of drinking water. These tests include: Colilert (R), Colilert-18 (R), Colisure (R), m-Coli Blue 24 (R), Readycult (R) Coliforms 100, Chromocult (R), Coliscan (R), E * Colite (R), Colitag (TM) and MI Agar. The utility of the enzyme based test systems is based on both the ability of the test to detect the target organisms at low levels and the ability of the test system to suppress the growth of non-target organisms that might result in false positive results. Differences in the ability of some of these methods to detect total coliform and E. coli, as well as suppress Aeromonas spp., a common cause of "false positive" results, have been observed. As a result, this study was undertaken to elucidate the strengths and weaknesses of each method. Water samples were collected from three geographically and chemically diverse groundwaters; in Wisconsin. one-hundred milliliter aliquots; were individually spiked with both low concentrations (one to ten organisms) and high concentrations (fifty to one-hundred) of each of five different total coliform organisms (Serratia, Citrobacter, Enterobacter, E coli, & Klebsiella). These spiked samples were used to test the capability of ten enzyme-based test systems to both detect and enumerate the spiked organisms. in addition, 100 ml samples were independently spiked with two different strains of Aeromonas spp. at six different levels, to assess the ability of each enzyme-based test to suppress Aeromonas spp. Analysis of the data indicated that wide variability exists among USEPA approved tests to detect and quantify total coliforms, as well as suppress Aeromonas spp.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 282
页数:16
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
American Public Health Association, 1998, STAND METH EX WAT WA
[2]  
BLACKBURN BG, 2004, CDC SURVEILLANCE SUM, P23
[3]   NEW MEDIUM FOR THE SIMULTANEOUS DETECTION OF TOTAL COLIFORMS AND ESCHERICHIA-COLI IN WATER [J].
BRENNER, KP ;
RANKIN, CC ;
ROYBAL, YR ;
STELMA, GN ;
SCARPINO, PV ;
DUFOUR, AP .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1993, 59 (11) :3534-3544
[4]  
*CHARM SCI INC, 2004, E COL MAN LIT
[5]  
Craun GF, 1997, J AM WATER WORKS ASS, V89, P96
[6]  
EDBERG SC, 1991, J ASSOC OFF ANA CHEM, V74, P526
[7]  
*EMD CHEM INC, 2004, READ COL 100 MAN LIT
[8]  
FABER W, 1997, P 1996 AWWA WAT QUAL
[9]  
FRICKER C, 2003, WQTC C P 2003 AM WAT
[10]   Use of two formulations of Colilert and QuantiTray(TM) for assessment of the bacteriological quality of water [J].
Fricker, EJ ;
Illingworth, KS ;
Fricker, CR .
WATER RESEARCH, 1997, 31 (10) :2495-2499