Cooperation and commune longevity: A test of the costly signaling theory of religion

被引:254
作者
Sosis, R [1 ]
Bressler, ER
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[2] McMaster Univ, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
关键词
cooperation; costly signaling theory; group solidarity; 19th-century communes; ritual; religion; utopian societies;
D O I
10.1177/1069397103037002003
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The costly signaling theory of religion posits that religious rituals and taboos can promote intragroup cooperation,, which is argued to be the primary adaptive benefit of religion. To test this theory, the authors collected historical data on the-constraints and ritual requirements that eighty-three 19th-century U.S. communes imposed on their members. All communes must solve the collective action problem-of cooperative labor to survive;thus, they are an ideal population to assess the impact of ritual and taboo on intragroup cooperation. The authors evaluated whether communes that imposed costlier requirements survived longer than less demanding communes and whether costly requirements and religiosity interact to promote cooperation. The results support aspects of the costly signaling theory of religion and reveal new avenues for its development. The authors discuss some of the shortcomings of the theory and explore ways to expand the theory that incorporate additional features of ritual and religious belief.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 239
页数:29
相关论文
共 66 条
[21]  
Gavron D., 2000, The Kibbutz: Awakening from Utopia
[22]  
Hall John R, 1978, The Ways Out: Utopian Communal Groups in an Age of Babylon
[23]   SOCIAL-ORGANIZATION AND PATHWAYS OF COMMITMENT - TYPES OF COMMUNAL GROUPS, RATIONAL CHOICE THEORY, AND THE KANTER THESIS [J].
HALL, JR .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1988, 53 (05) :679-692
[25]  
Hinds William Alfred, 1975, American Communities and Cooperative Colonies, V2nd
[26]   SACRIFICE AND STIGMA - REDUCING FREE-RIDING IN CULTS, COMMUNES, AND OTHER COLLECTIVES [J].
IANNACCONE, LR .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1992, 100 (02) :271-291
[27]   WHY STRICT CHURCHES ARE STRONG [J].
IANNACCONE, LR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1994, 99 (05) :1180-1211
[28]  
Irons W., 1996, INVESTIGATING BIOL F, P1
[29]  
Irons W, 1996, RELIG SCI HIST METHO, P375
[30]  
Irons W., 2001, EVOLUTION CAPACITY C, P292