Gift exchange and reciprocity in competitive experimental markets

被引:164
作者
Fehr, E
Kirchsteiger, G
Riedl, A
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Inst Empirical Res Econ, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Vienna, Dept Econ, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
[3] Inst Adv Studies, Dept Econ, A-1060 Vienna, Austria
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
competitive experimental markets; gift exchange; reciprocity;
D O I
10.1016/S0014-2921(96)00051-7
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
One of the outstanding results of three decades of laboratory market research is that under rather weak conditions prices and quantities in competitive experimental markets converge to the competitive equilibrium. Yet, the design of these experiments ruled out gift exchange or reciprocity motives, that is, subjects could not reciprocate for a gift. This paper reports the results of experiments which do not rule out reciprocal interactions between buyers and sellers. Sellers have the opportunity to choose quality levels which are above the levels enforceable by buyers. In principle they can, therefore, reward buyers who offer them high prices. Yet, such reciprocating behaviour lowers sellers' monetary payoff and is, hence, not subgame perfect. The data reveal that many sellers behave reciprocally. This generates a positive relation between prices and quality at the aggregate level which is anticipated by the buyers. As a result, buyers are willing to pay prices which are substantially above sellers' reservation prices. These results indicate that reciprocity motives may indeed be capable of driving a competitive experimental market permanently away from the competitive outcome. The data, therefore, support the gift exchange approach to the explanation of involuntary unemployment. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 34
页数:34
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   THE FAIR WAGE-EFFORT HYPOTHESIS AND UNEMPLOYMENT [J].
AKERLOF, GA ;
YELLEN, YL .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1990, 105 (02) :255-283
[2]   LABOR CONTRACTS AS PARTIAL GIFT EXCHANGE [J].
AKERLOF, GA .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1982, 97 (04) :543-569
[3]   TRUST, RECIPROCITY, AND SOCIAL-HISTORY [J].
BERG, J ;
DICKHAUT, J ;
MCCABE, K .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 1995, 10 (01) :122-142
[4]  
BINMORE K, 1994, J INST THEOR ECON, V150, P45
[5]  
BOLTON GE, 1991, AM ECON REV, V81, P1096
[6]   ANONYMITY VERSUS PUNISHMENT IN ULTIMATUM BARGAINING [J].
BOLTON, GE ;
ZWICK, R .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 1995, 10 (01) :95-121
[7]   COMPETITIVE-EQUILIBRIUM CONVERGENCE IN A POSTED-OFFER MARKET WITH EXTREME EARNINGS INEQUITIES [J].
CASON, TN ;
WILLIAMS, AW .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1990, 14 (03) :331-352
[8]   Involuntary unemployment and non-compensating wage differentials in an experimental labour market [J].
Fehr, E ;
Kirchsteiger, G ;
Riedl, A .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1996, 106 (434) :106-121
[9]   INSIDER POWER, WAGE DISCRIMINATION AND FAIRNESS [J].
FEHR, E ;
KIRCHSTEIGER, G .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1994, 104 (424) :571-583
[10]   DOES FAIRNESS PREVENT MARKET CLEARING - AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION [J].
FEHR, E ;
KIRCHSTEIGER, G ;
RIEDL, A .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1993, 108 (02) :437-459