Gift exchange and reciprocity in competitive experimental markets

被引:164
作者
Fehr, E
Kirchsteiger, G
Riedl, A
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Inst Empirical Res Econ, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Vienna, Dept Econ, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
[3] Inst Adv Studies, Dept Econ, A-1060 Vienna, Austria
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
competitive experimental markets; gift exchange; reciprocity;
D O I
10.1016/S0014-2921(96)00051-7
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
One of the outstanding results of three decades of laboratory market research is that under rather weak conditions prices and quantities in competitive experimental markets converge to the competitive equilibrium. Yet, the design of these experiments ruled out gift exchange or reciprocity motives, that is, subjects could not reciprocate for a gift. This paper reports the results of experiments which do not rule out reciprocal interactions between buyers and sellers. Sellers have the opportunity to choose quality levels which are above the levels enforceable by buyers. In principle they can, therefore, reward buyers who offer them high prices. Yet, such reciprocating behaviour lowers sellers' monetary payoff and is, hence, not subgame perfect. The data reveal that many sellers behave reciprocally. This generates a positive relation between prices and quality at the aggregate level which is anticipated by the buyers. As a result, buyers are willing to pay prices which are substantially above sellers' reservation prices. These results indicate that reciprocity motives may indeed be capable of driving a competitive experimental market permanently away from the competitive outcome. The data, therefore, support the gift exchange approach to the explanation of involuntary unemployment. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 34
页数:34
相关论文
共 24 条
[11]   AN EXPERIMENTAL-ANALYSIS OF ULTIMATUM BARGAINING [J].
GUTH, W ;
SCHMITTBERGER, R ;
SCHWARZE, B .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1982, 3 (04) :367-388
[12]   ULTIMATUM BARGAINING BEHAVIOR - A SURVEY AND COMPARISON OF EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS [J].
GUTH, W ;
TIETZ, R .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 11 (03) :417-449
[13]   CULTURE AND COMPETITION - A LABORATORY MARKET COMPARISON BETWEEN CHINA AND THE WEST [J].
KACHELMEIER, SJ ;
SHEHATA, M .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1992, 19 (02) :145-168
[14]  
KAHNEMAN D, 1986, AM ECON REV, V76, P728
[15]   THE ROLE OF ENVY IN ULTIMATUM GAMES [J].
KIRCHSTEIGER, G .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1994, 25 (03) :373-389
[16]   SOCIAL UTILITY AND DECISION-MAKING IN INTERPERSONAL CONTEXTS [J].
LOEWENSTEIN, GF ;
BAZERMAN, MH ;
THOMPSON, L .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 57 (03) :426-441
[17]  
OCHS J, 1989, AM ECON REV, V79, P355
[18]   EXPERIMENTAL EXAMINATION OF 2 EXCHANGE INSTITUTIONS [J].
PLOTT, CR ;
SMITH, VL .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1978, 45 (01) :133-153
[19]  
ROTH AE, 1991, AM ECON REV, V81, P1068
[20]   LEARNING IN EXTENSIVE-FORM GAMES - EXPERIMENTAL-DATA AND SIMPLE DYNAMIC-MODELS IN THE INTERMEDIATE-TERM [J].
ROTH, AE ;
EREV, I .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 1995, 8 (01) :164-212