The Use of the Behavioral Pain Scale to Assess Pain in Conscious Sedated Patients

被引:97
作者
Ahlers, Sabine J. G. M. [1 ]
van der Veen, Aletta M. [2 ]
van Dijk, Monique [3 ]
Tibboel, Dick [3 ]
Knibbe, Catherijne A. J. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Clin Pharm, NL-3440 EM Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[2] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care, NL-3440 EM Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Dept Pediat Surg, Med Ctr, Erasmus MC,Sophia Childrens Hosp, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; HEALTH-STATUS; ANALGESIA; INTERRUPTION; VALIDATION; ADULT; ICU;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c3119e
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Assessing pain in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients is a great challenge. There is a need for an adequate pain measurement tool for use in conscious sedated patients because of their questionable communicative abilities. In this Study, we evaluated the use of the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) in conscious sedated patients in comparison with its use in deeply sedated patients, for whom the BPS was developed. Additionally, in conscious sedated patients, the combination of the BPS and the patient-rated Verbal Rating Scale (VRS-4) was evaluated. METHODS: We performed a prospective evaluation study in 80 nonparalyzed critically ill adult intensive care unit patients. Over 2 me, nurses performed 175 observation series: 1.26 in deeply sedated patients and 49 in Conscious sedated patients. Each observation series consisted of BPS ratings (range 3-12) at 4 points: at rest, during a nonpainful procedure, at retest rest, and during a routine painful procedure. Patients in the conscious sedated state also self-reported their pain using the 4-point VRS-4. RESULTS: BPS scores during painful procedures were significantly higher than those at rest, both in deeply sedated patients (5.1 [4.8-5.5] vs 3.4 [3.3-3.5], respectively) and Conscious sedated patients (5.4 [4.9-5.9] vs 3.8 [3.5-4.1], respectively) (mean [95% confidence interval]). For both groups, scores obtained during the nonpainful procedure and at rest did not significantly differ. There was a strong correlation between nurses' BPS ratings and conscious sedated patients' VRS-4 ratings during the painful procedure (r(s) = 0.67, P < 0.001). At rest and during nonpainful procedures, 98% of the observations were rated as acceptable pain (VRS 1 or 2) by both nurses and patients. During painful procedures, nurses rated the pain higher than patients did in 169% of the observations and lower in 12% of the observations. CONCLUSION: The BPS is a valid tool for measuring pain in conscious sedated patients during painful procedures. Thus, for noncommunicative and mechanically ventilated patients, it may be regarded as a bridge between the observational scale used by nurses and the VRS-4 used by patients who are able to self-report pain. (Anesth Analg 2010;110:127-33)
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 133
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Comparison of different pain scoring systems in critically ill patients in a general ICU [J].
Ahlers, Sabine J. G. M. ;
van Gulik, Laura ;
van der Veen, Aletta M. ;
van Dongen, Hendricus P. A. ;
Bruins, Peter ;
Belitser, Svetlana V. ;
de Boer, Anthonius ;
Tibboel, Dick ;
Knibbe, Catherijne A. J. .
CRITICAL CARE, 2008, 12 (01)
[2]   Validation of a behavioral pain scale in critically ill, sedated, and mechanically ventilated patients [J].
Aïssaoui, Y ;
Zeggwagh, AA ;
Zekraoui, A ;
Abidi, K ;
Abouqal, R .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2005, 101 (05) :1470-1476
[3]  
Blenkharn Audrey, 2002, Intensive Crit Care Nurs, V18, P332, DOI 10.1016/S0964-3397(02)00071-X
[4]   A descriptive study of the use of visual analogue scales and verbal rating scales for the assessment of postoperative pain in orthopedic patients [J].
Briggs, M ;
Closs, JS .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1999, 18 (06) :438-446
[5]  
Cade Clare H, 2008, Nurs Crit Care, V13, P288, DOI 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2008.00294.x
[6]   Impact of systematic evaluation of pain and agitation in an intensive care unit [J].
Chanques, G ;
Jaber, S ;
Barbotte, E ;
Violet, S ;
Sebbane, M ;
Perrigault, PF ;
Mann, C ;
Lefrant, JY ;
Eledjam, JJ .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2006, 34 (06) :1691-1699
[7]  
Cronbach LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297
[8]  
Fleiss JL., 1981, Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, V2nd ed, P212, DOI [DOI 10.1002/0471445428.CH18, 10.1002/0471445428.ch18]
[9]   Pain assessment in infants and children [J].
Franck, LS ;
Greenberg, CS ;
Stevens, B .
PEDIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2000, 47 (03) :487-+
[10]   The frequency and cost of patient-initiated device removal in the ICU [J].
Fraser, GL ;
Riker, RR ;
Prato, BS ;
Wilkins, ML .
PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2001, 21 (01) :1-6