Pharmacoeconomic analysis of oprelvekin (recombinant human interleukin-11) for secondary prophylaxis of thrombocytopenia in solid tumor patients receiving chemotherapy

被引:59
作者
Cantor, SB
Elting, LS
Hudson, DV
Rubenstein, EB
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Sect Hlth Serv Res, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
interleukin-11; oprelvekin; costs and cost analysis; pharmacoeconomics; medical decision making; thrombocytopenia; platelet transfusion;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.11447
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Previous research has shown oprelvekin (recombinant human interleukin-11 [rhIL-11]) to be effective in reducing the requirements for platelet transfusions after myelosuppressive chemotherapy in patients who have previously experienced thrombocytopenia. The economic consequences of the routine use of this platelet growth factor and the usual standard of platelet transfusions for prophylaxis of severe chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia have not been compared. METHODS. The authors constructed a decision-analytic model to compare the alternatives of rhIL-11 versus usual care using probability, outcome, and cost data from previously published clinical trials and their own institutional sources. They incorporated the costs of platelet transfusions and adverse events from rhIL-11 into the analysis. Quality-of-life outcomes were not considered. The pharmacoeconomic analysis was based on the criterion of cost minimization from the payer's perspective. RESULTS. The expected cost of the usual care strategy for prophylaxis of severe thrombocytopenia (transfusion when platelets < 20,000 muL(-1)) was $3495 for a 3-week cycle of chemotherapy. The prophylactic rhIL-11 strategy was more expensive, with an expected cost of $5328 over the same time period. Nonetheless, it was associated with fewer platelet transfusions, avoiding an average of 6.7 U compared with usual care. The savings from avoidance of platelet transfusion and adverse reactions to transfusion from the use of rhIL-11 were not offset by the substantial cost of the pharmaceutical. The greater expected costs from the rhIL-11 strategy were relatively insensitive to the unit price and efficacy of rhIL-11 and the costs of platelet transfusions and monitoring. CONCLUSIONS. From the payer's perspective, rhIL-11 cannot be considered a cost-saving clinical strategy compared with routine platelet transfusions for patients with severe chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia. (C) 2003 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:3099 / 3106
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Economic consequences of alterations in platelet transfusion dose: analysis of a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial
    Ackerman, SJ
    Klumpp, TR
    Guzman, GI
    Herman, JH
    Gaughan, JP
    Bleecker, GC
    Mangan, KF
    [J]. TRANSFUSION, 2000, 40 (12) : 1457 - 1462
  • [2] INCIDENCE OF HEMORRHAGIC COMPLICATIONS IN PATIENTS WITH CANCER
    BELT, RJ
    LEITE, C
    HAAS, CD
    STEPHENS, RL
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1978, 239 (24): : 2571 - 2574
  • [3] Economic analysis of a randomized placebo-controlled phase III study of granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor in adult patients (&gt;55 to 70 years of age) with acute myelogenous leukemia
    Bennett, CL
    Stinson, TJ
    Tallman, MS
    Stadtmauer, EA
    Marsh, RW
    Friedenberg, W
    Lazarus, HM
    Kaminer, L
    Golub, RM
    Rowe, JM
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1999, 10 (02) : 177 - 182
  • [4] Economic analysis of granulocyte colony stimulating factor as adjunct therapy for older patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML): Estimates from a Southwest Oncology Group clinical trial
    Bennett, CL
    Hynes, D
    Godwin, J
    Stinson, TJ
    Golub, RM
    Appelbaum, FR
    [J]. CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2001, 19 (06) : 603 - 610
  • [5] A multicenter study of platelet recovery and utilization in patients after myeloablative therapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
    Bernstein, SH
    Nademanee, AP
    Vose, JM
    Tricot, G
    Fay, JW
    Negrin, RS
    DiPersio, J
    Rondon, G
    Champlin, R
    Barnett, MJ
    Cornetta, K
    Herzig, GP
    Vaughan, W
    Geils, G
    Keating, J
    Messner, H
    Wolff, SN
    Miller, KB
    Linker, C
    Cairo, M
    Hellmann, S
    Ashby, M
    Stryker, S
    Nash, RA
    [J]. BLOOD, 1998, 91 (09) : 3509 - 3517
  • [6] Evaluating the total costs of chemotherapy-induced toxicity: Results from a pilot study with ovarian cancer patients
    Calhoun, EA
    Chang, CH
    Welshman, EE
    Fishman, DA
    Lurain, JR
    Bennett, CL
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2001, 6 (05) : 441 - 445
  • [7] Cantor S B, 1993, Pharmacoeconomics, V3, P244, DOI 10.2165/00019053-199303030-00007
  • [8] Costs of blood transfusion: A process-flow analysis
    Cantor, SB
    Hudson, DV
    Lichtiger, B
    Rubenstein, EB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (07) : 2364 - 2370
  • [9] CANTOR SB, 1995, PRIMARY CARE, V22, P261
  • [10] Cost-effectiveness of cardioversion and antiarrhythmic therapy in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
    Catherwood, E
    Fitzpatrick, WD
    Greenberg, ML
    Holzberger, PT
    Malenka, DJ
    Gerling, BR
    Birkmeyer, JD
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1999, 130 (08) : 625 - +