Second-line chemotherapy with irinotecan plus carmustine in glioblastoma recurrent or progressive after first-line temozolomide chemotherapy:: A phase II study of the Gruppo Italiano Cooperativo di Neuro-Oncologia (GICNO)

被引:94
作者
Brandes, AA
Tosoni, A
Basso, U
Reni, M
Valduga, F
Monfardini, S
Amistà, P
Nicolardi, L
Sotti, G
Ermani, M
机构
[1] Univ Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Padua, Italy
[2] Univ Hosp Padova, Dept Neuroradiol, Padua, Italy
[3] Univ Hosp Padova, Dept Radiotherapy, Padua, Italy
[4] Univ Hosp Padova, Dept Neurol Sci, Padua, Italy
[5] Hosp San Raffaele, Dept Radiochemotherapy, I-20132 Milan, Italy
[6] Osped S Chiara, Dept Med Oncol, Trento, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2004.06.181
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the most frequent brain tumor in adults, is not considered chemosensitive. Nevertheless, there is widespread use of first-line chemotherapy, often with temozolomide, as a therapeutic option in patients with progressive disease after surgery and radiotherapy. However, at the time of second recurrence and/or progression, active and noncross-resistant chemotherapy regimens are required. The aim of the present multicenter phase II trial, therefore, was to ascertain the efficacy of second-line carmustine (BCNU) and irinotecan chemotherapy. Patients and Methods Patients with histologically confirmed GBM, recurring or progressing after surgery, standard radiotherapy and a first-line temozolomide-based chemotherapy, were considered eligible. The primary end-point was progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS-6), and secondary end-points included response rate, toxicity, and survival. All patients were on enzyme-inducing antiepileptic prophylaxis. Chemotherapy consisted of BCNU (100 mg/m(2) on day 1) plus irinotecan (175 mg/m(2)/weekly for 4 weeks), every 6 weeks, for a maximum of eight cycles. In the absence of grade 2 toxicity, the irinotecan dose was increased to 200 mg/m(2). Results A total of 42 patients (median age, 53.4 years; median Karnofsky performance status, 80; range, 60 to 90) were included in the study. PFS-6 was 30.3% (95% CI, 18.5% to 49.7%). Median time to progression was 17 weeks (95% CI, 11.9 to 23.9). Nine partial responses (21.4%; 95% CI, 9% to 34%) were obtained. Toxicity was manageable. Conclusion The BCNU plus irinotecan regimen seems active and non-cross-resistant in patients with GBM with recurrence after temozolomide-based chemotherapy. (C) 2004 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页码:4779 / 4786
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [11] GILBERT MR, 2000, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V19, pA161
  • [12] Randomized trial of a slow-release versus a standard formulation of cytarabine for the intrathecal treatment of lymphomatous meningitis
    Glantz, MJ
    LaFollette, S
    Jaeckle, KA
    Shapiro, W
    Swinnen, L
    Rozental, JR
    Phuphanich, S
    Rogers, LR
    Gutheil, JC
    Batchelor, T
    Lyter, D
    Chamberlain, M
    Maria, BL
    Schiffer, C
    Bashir, R
    Thomas, D
    Cowens, W
    Howell, SB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (10) : 3110 - 3116
  • [13] Chemotherapy response criteria in malignant glioma
    Grant, R
    Liang, BC
    Slattery, J
    Greenberg, HS
    Junck, L
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 1997, 48 (05) : 1336 - 1340
  • [14] Phase II trial of temozolomide plus the matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, marimastat, in recurrent and progressive glioblastoma multiforme
    Groves, MD
    Puduvalli, VK
    Hess, KR
    Jaeckle, KA
    Peterson, P
    Yung, WKA
    Levin, VA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (05) : 1383 - 1388
  • [15] Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of the topoisomerase inhibitor irinotecan in cancer patients
    Gupta, E
    Mick, R
    Ramirez, J
    Wang, XL
    Lestingi, TM
    Vokes, EE
    Ratain, MJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (04) : 1502 - 1510
  • [16] Hare CB, 1997, CANCER CHEMOTH PHARM, V39, P187
  • [17] Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin-efficacy in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma
    Hau, P
    Fabel, K
    Baumgart, U
    Rümmele, P
    Grauer, O
    Bock, A
    Dietmaier, C
    Dietmaier, W
    Dietrich, J
    Dudel, C
    Hübner, F
    Jauch, T
    Drechsel, E
    Kleiter, I
    Wismeth, G
    Zellner, A
    Brawanski, A
    Steinbrecher, A
    Marienhagen, J
    Bogdahn, U
    [J]. CANCER, 2004, 100 (06) : 1199 - 1207
  • [18] Phase II evaluation of temozolomide and 13-cis-retinoic acid for the treatment of recurrent and progressive malignant glioma:: A North American Brain Tumor Consortium study
    Jaeckle, KA
    Hess, KR
    Yung, WKA
    Greenberg, H
    Fine, H
    Schiff, D
    Pollack, IF
    Kuhn, J
    Fink, K
    Mehta, M
    Cloughesy, T
    Nicholas, MK
    Chang, S
    Prados, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (12) : 2305 - 2311
  • [19] NONPARAMETRIC-ESTIMATION FROM INCOMPLETE OBSERVATIONS
    KAPLAN, EL
    MEIER, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1958, 53 (282) : 457 - 481
  • [20] PCV chemotherapy for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme
    Kappelle, AC
    Postma, TJ
    Taphoorn, MJB
    Groeneveld, GJ
    van den Bent, MJ
    van Groeningen, CJ
    Zonnenberg, BA
    Sneeuw, KCA
    Heimans, JJ
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2001, 56 (01) : 118 - 120