Prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity by free energy simulations: assumptions, pitfalls and expectations

被引:199
作者
Michel, Julien [1 ,2 ]
Essex, Jonathan W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Inst Struct & Mol Biol, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Yale Univ, Dept Chem, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[3] Univ Southampton, Sch Chem, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
关键词
Structure-based drug design; Protein-ligand binding affinity; Free energy calculations; Molecular simulations; MONTE-CARLO-SIMULATION; MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS; IMPLICIT SOLVENT SIMULATIONS; GENERALIZED BORN MODELS; RELATIVE FREE-ENERGY; CHARGE FORCE-FIELD; EQUATION-OF-STATE; NONNUCLEOSIDE INHIBITORS; LAMBDA-DYNAMICS; PERTURBATION CALCULATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s10822-010-9363-3
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Many limitations of current computer-aided drug design arise from the difficulty of reliably predicting the binding affinity of a small molecule to a biological target. There is thus a strong interest in novel computational methodologies that claim predictions of greater accuracy than current scoring functions, and at a throughput compatible with the rapid pace of drug discovery in the pharmaceutical industry. Notably, computational methodologies firmly rooted in statistical thermodynamics have received particular attention in recent years. Yet free energy calculations can be daunting to learn for a novice user because of numerous technical issues and various approaches advocated by experts in the field. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the current capabilities of free energy calculations and to discuss the applicability of this technology to drug discovery.
引用
收藏
页码:639 / 658
页数:20
相关论文
共 159 条
[11]   Absolute binding free energies: A quantitative approach for their calculation [J].
Boresch, S ;
Tettinger, F ;
Leitgeb, M ;
Karplus, M .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2003, 107 (35) :9535-9551
[12]  
Bowers KJ, 2006, SCALABLE ALGORITHMS
[13]   Predicting Ligand Binding Affinity with Alchemical Free Energy Methods in a Polar Model Binding Site [J].
Boyce, Sarah E. ;
Mobley, David L. ;
Rocklin, Gabriel J. ;
Graves, Alan P. ;
Dill, Ken A. ;
Shoichet, Brian K. .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2009, 394 (04) :747-763
[14]   Massively Multicore Parallelization of Kohn-Sham Theory [J].
Brown, Philip ;
Woods, Christopher ;
McIntosh-Smith, Simon ;
Manby, Frederick R. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2008, 4 (10) :1620-1626
[15]   Free energy, entropy, and induced fit in host-guest recognition: Calculations with the second-generation mining minima algorithm [J].
Chang, CE ;
Gilson, MK .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2004, 126 (40) :13156-13164
[16]   Ligand configurational entropy and protein binding [J].
Chang, Chia-en A. ;
Chen, Wei ;
Gilson, Michael K. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2007, 104 (05) :1534-1539
[17]   Application of torsion angle molecular dynamics for efficient sampling of protein conformations [J].
Chen, JH ;
Im, W ;
Brooks, CL .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2005, 26 (15) :1565-1578
[18]  
CHENG Y, 1973, BIOCHEM PHARMACOL, V22, P3099
[19]  
Chipot C., 2007, FREE ENERGY CALCULAT
[20]   Milestones in the Activation of a G Protein-Coupled Receptor. Insights from Molecular-Dynamics Simulations into the Human Cholecystokinin Receptor-1 [J].
Chipot, Christophe .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2008, 4 (12) :2150-2159