The multifarious effects of dispersal and gene flow on contemporary adaptation

被引:449
作者
Garant, Dany [1 ]
Forde, Samantha E.
Hendry, Andrew P.
机构
[1] Univ Sherbrooke, Dept Biol, Sherbrooke, PQ J1K 2R1, Canada
[2] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
[3] McGill Univ, Redpath Museum, Montreal, PQ H3A 2K6, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Biol, Montreal, PQ H3A 2K6, Canada
关键词
adaptive divergence; coevolution; demography; ecological speciation; genetics;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01228.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
1. Dispersal and gene flow can have a variety of interacting effects on evolution. These effects can either promote or constrain adaptive divergence through either genetic or demographic routes. The relative importance of these effects is unknown because few attempts have been made to conceptually integrate and test them. 2. We draw a broad distinction between situations with vs. without strong coevolutionary dynamics. This distinction is important because the adaptive peak for a given population is more mobile in the former than in the latter. This difference makes ongoing evolutionary potential more important in the presence of strong coevolutionary dynamics than in their absence. 3. We advance a conceptual integration of the various effects of gene flow and dispersal on adaptive divergence. In line with other authors, but not necessarily for the same reasons, we suggest that an intermediate level of gene flow will allow the greatest adaptive divergence. 4. When dispersal is quite low, we predict that an increase will have positive effects on adaptive divergence, owing to genetic/demographic rescue and 'reinforcement.' The rescue effect may be more important in small populations and in homogeneous environments. The reinforcement effect may be more common in large populations and in heterogeneous environments. 5. Once a certain level of dispersal is reached, we predict that a further increase may have negative effects on adaptive divergence. These effects may arise if carrying capacity is exceeded or maladaptive genes are introduced. Many additional effects remain to be integrated into this framework, and doing so may yield novel insights into the factors influencing evolution on ecological time-scales.
引用
收藏
页码:434 / 443
页数:10
相关论文
共 104 条
[21]   Genomic evidence for divergence with gene flow in host races of the larch budmoth [J].
Emelianov, I ;
Marec, F ;
Mallet, J .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2004, 271 (1534) :97-105
[22]   GENE FLOW AND POPULATION DIFFERENTIATION [J].
ENDLER, JA .
SCIENCE, 1973, 179 (4070) :243-250
[23]   Adaptation varies through space and time in a coevolving host-parasitoid interaction [J].
Forde, SE ;
Thompson, JN ;
Bohannan, BJM .
NATURE, 2004, 431 (7010) :841-844
[24]   Consequences of unequal population size, asymmetric gene flow and sex-biased dispersal on population structure in brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis) [J].
Fraser, DJ ;
Lippé, C ;
Bernatchez, L .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2004, 13 (01) :67-80
[25]   Local adaptation and gene-for-gene coevolution in a metapopulation model [J].
Gandon, S ;
Capowiez, Y ;
Dubois, Y ;
Michalakis, Y ;
Olivieri, I .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1996, 263 (1373) :1003-1009
[26]   Local adaptation, evolutionary potential and host-parasite coevolution: interactions between migration, mutation, population size and generation time [J].
Gandon, S ;
Michalakis, Y .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2002, 15 (03) :451-462
[27]  
Gandon Sylvain, 2001, P155
[28]   Evolution driven by differential dispersal within a wild bird population [J].
Garant, D ;
Kruuk, LEB ;
Wilkin, TA ;
McCleery, RH ;
Sheldon, BC .
NATURE, 2005, 433 (7021) :60-65
[29]  
GarciaRamos G, 1997, EVOLUTION, V51, P21, DOI [10.2307/2410956, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb02384.x]
[30]  
Gavrilets S., 2004, FITNESS LANDSCAPES O, DOI DOI 10.1515/9780691187051