Complementary stability and loop shaping for improved human-robot interaction

被引:209
作者
Buerger, Stephen P.
Hogan, Neville
机构
[1] Sandia Natl Labs, Intelligent Syst Robot & Cybernet Grp, Albuquerque, NM 87185 USA
[2] MIT, Dept Mech Engn, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[3] MIT, Dept Brain & Cognit Sci, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
actuators; control systems; force control; haptics; man-machine systems; robots;
D O I
10.1109/TRO.2007.892229
中图分类号
TP24 [机器人技术];
学科分类号
080202 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Robots intended for high-force interaction with humans face particular challenges to achieve performance and stability. They require low and tunable endpoint impedance as well as high force capacity, and demand actuators with low intrinsic impedance, the ability to exhibit high impedance (relative to the human subject), and a high ratio of force to weight. Force-feedback control can be used to improve actuator performance, but causes well-known interaction stability problems. This paper presents a novel method to design actuator controllers for physically interactive machines. A loop-shaping design method is developed from a study of fundamental differences between interaction control and the more common servo problem. This approach addresses the interaction problem by redefining stability and performance, using a computational approach to search parameter spaces and displaying variations in performance as control parameters are adjusted. A measure of complementary stability is introduced, and the coupled stability problem is transformed to a robust stability problem using limited knowledge of the environment dynamics (in this case, the human). Design examples show that this new measure improves performance beyond the current best-practice stability constraint (passivity). The controller was implemented on an interactive robot, verifying stability and performance. Testing showed that the new controller out-performed a state-of-the-art controller on the same system.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 244
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
[21]  
Moore G. E., 1965, ELECTRONICS, V38, P114, DOI [DOI 10.1109/N-SSC.2006.4785860, 10.1109/N-SSC.2006.4785860]
[22]   STABILITY AND PERFORMANCE LIMITS OF INTERACTION CONTROLLERS [J].
NEWMAN, WS .
JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1992, 114 (04) :563-570
[23]  
PALAZZOLO JJ, 2005, THESIS MIT CAMBRIDGE
[24]  
QIAN HP, 1992, P IEEE INT C ROB AUT, V2, P1374
[25]  
ROBERTS M, 2004, THESIS MIT CAMBRIDGE
[26]  
Siciliano B., 1999, KLUW ROBOT
[27]   Teleoperator slave - WAM design methodology [J].
Townsend, WT ;
Guertin, JA .
INDUSTRIAL ROBOT, 1999, 26 (03) :167-177
[28]  
TSUJI T, 1995, BIOL CYBERN, V72, P475, DOI 10.1007/BF00199890
[29]   A THEORETICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF EXPLICIT FORCE CONTROL STRATEGIES FOR MANIPULATORS [J].
VOLPE, R ;
KHOSLA, P .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1993, 38 (11) :1634-1650
[30]   STABILITY ANALYSIS OF POSITION AND FORCE CONTROL FOR ROBOT ARMS [J].
WEN, JT ;
MURPHY, S .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1991, 36 (03) :365-370