A randomized clinical trial comparing primary overlap with approximation repair of third-degree obstetric tears

被引:108
作者
Fitzpatrick, M
Behan, M
O'Connell, PR
O'Herlihy, C
机构
[1] Univ Coll Dublin, Natl Matern Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Dublin 2, Ireland
[2] Univ Coll Dublin, Natl Matern Hosp, Dept Radiol, Dublin 2, Ireland
[3] Univ Coll Dublin, Natl Matern Hosp, Dept Surg, Dublin 2, Ireland
[4] Mater Misericordiae Hosp, Dublin 7, Ireland
关键词
obstetric anal sphincter injury; primary repair; approximation and overlap;
D O I
10.1067/mob.2000.108880
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: We compared, in a prospective, randomized clinical trial, the subjective and objective outcomes after primary anal sphincter overlap or approximation repair of third-degree obstetric tears. STUDY DESIGN: In a prospective, randomized clinical trial at our university teaching hospital, we studied 112 primiparous women who sustained a third-degree tear during a 1-year period (July 1998-June 1999); they were randomly selected, at diagnosis, to receive either an overlap or an approximation repair. Obstetric personnel, trained in both methods, carried out the repairs immediately after delivery. Fifty-five women under went an overlap procedure, and 57 women underwent an approximation repair. Outcome measures assessed were symptoms of fecal incontinence, abnormal findings on anal manometry, and abnormal findings on endoanal ultrasonography at 3 months post partum. RESULTS: Obstetric factors, including mode of delivery, birth weight, duration of labor, and episiotomy incidence, did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Experience of the operator, analgesia used, and place of repair were similar in both groups, The median incontinence scores were 0/20 after overlap repair and 2/20 after approximation repair (difference not significant). Eleven women (20%) complained of fecal urgency after overlap repair, in comparison with 17 (30%) after approximation repair (difference not significant). There were no significant differences in either anal manometry or endoanal ultrasonographic results between the 2 groups. Six women (11%) had a significant (>1 quadrant) anal sphincter defect after primary overlap repair, compared with 3 (5%) after approximation repair (difference not significant). Overall, 66% of women had ultrasonographic evidence of a residual full-thickness defect in the external anal sphincter after primary repair. CONCLUSION: The outcome after primary repair of third-degree obstetric tear was similar whether an approximation or an overlap technique was used. Overall symptomatic outcome was flood, although two thirds of women had ultrasonographic evidence of residual anal sphincter damage irrespective of the method of repair.
引用
收藏
页码:1220 / 1224
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[11]  
MARCIO J, 1993, DIS COLON RECTUM, V36, P77
[12]  
ODRISCOLL K, 1986, ACTIVE MANAGEMENT LA
[13]   LATE REPAIR OF INJURIES OF ANAL SPHINCTER [J].
PARKS, AG ;
MCPARTLIN, JF .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE-LONDON, 1971, 64 (12) :1187-+
[14]   MANOMETRIC DIAGNOSIS OF ANAL-SPHINCTER INJURIES [J].
PERRY, RE ;
BLATCHFORD, GJ ;
CHRISTENSEN, MA ;
THORSON, AG ;
ATTWOOD, SEA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1990, 159 (01) :112-117
[15]   Primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter rupture using the overlap technique [J].
Sultan, AH ;
Monga, AK ;
Kumar, D ;
Stanton, SL .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1999, 106 (04) :318-323
[16]   3RD DEGREE OBSTETRIC ANAL-SPHINCTER TEARS - RISK-FACTORS AND OUTCOME OF PRIMARY REPAIR [J].
SULTAN, AH ;
KAMM, MA ;
HUDSON, CN ;
BARTRAM, CI .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 308 (6933) :887-891
[17]  
WHITFIELD CR, 1995, DEWHURSTS TXB OBSTET, P380
[18]   MANOMETRIC ASYMMETRY IN THE ANAL-CANAL IN CONTROLS AND PATIENTS WITH FECAL INCONTINENCE [J].
WILLIAMS, N ;
BARLOW, J ;
HOBSON, A ;
SCOTT, N ;
IRVING, M .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1995, 38 (12) :1275-1280