Impact of mammalian enzyme pretreatment on the fermentability of carbohydrate-rich feedstuffs

被引:23
作者
Bauer, E
Williams, BA
Voigt, C
Mosenthin, R
Verstegen, MWA
机构
[1] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Anim Nutr Grp, Wageningen Inst Anim Sci, NL-6709 PG Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Hohenheim, Inst Anim Nutr, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
carbohydrates; chyme; enzyme pretreatment; fermentation kinetics; fermentability; pig; small intestine; large intestine; cumulative gas production;
D O I
10.1002/jsfa.1293
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Several carbohydrate-rich substrates (spent brewer's grains, potato peel, potato starch, wheat bran, sugarbeet pulp and a maize-based standard diet for pigs) were pretreated with digestive enzymes, and the in vitro fermentability of these treated substrates and their untreated counterparts was assessed using the cumulative gas production technique. A comparison was also made between the enzyme-treated (ET) and untreated (UT) standard diet for pigs, and chyme which originated from pigs fed that diet, to determine whether the enzyme treatment resulted in material with similar fermentability to that reaching the large intestine in vivo. The enzyme pretreatment was performed according to a modified in vitro method of Babinszky et al (J Sci Food Agric 50:173-178 (1990)). Generally, it was shown that the fermentabilities of the ET and UT substrates were different. There was also a significant difference between the fermentation characteristics of the ET diet and chyme. Chyme produced less gas (P < 0.05), and the time at which half of the gas had been produced (C) occurred later (P < 0.05). The maximum rate of fermentation (R-M) was slower for chyme (P < 0.05). Fermentation of chyme led to more ammonia (P < 0.05) and a tendency to more volatile fatty acids at the end of fermentation. These differences in fermentability of the ET diet and chyme (from pigs fed the same diet) may be the result of differences which relate purely to the action of the enzymes chosen to work in vitro, compared with those which are actually present in vivo. However, the results also suggest that it is not only enzymatic digestion which is occurring in the small intestine. This is an important consideration when using ileal techniques to determine digestibility of feedstuffs. (C) 2003 Society of Chemical Industry.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 214
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   AN INVITRO METHOD FOR PREDICTION OF THE DIGESTIBLE CRUDE PROTEIN-CONTENT IN PIG FEEDS [J].
BABINSZKY, L ;
VANDERMEER, JM ;
BOER, H ;
DENHARTOG, LA .
JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 1990, 50 (02) :173-178
[2]   THE CONTROL AND CONSEQUENCES OF BACTERIAL FERMENTATION IN THE HUMAN COLON [J].
CUMMINGS, JH ;
MACFARLANE, GT .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BACTERIOLOGY, 1991, 70 (06) :443-459
[3]  
Drake A. P., 1991, In vitrodigestion for pigs and poultry., P162
[4]  
EGGUM BO, 1991, P 5 INT S DIG PHYS P, P213
[5]  
FULLER MF, 1991, EAAP PUBLIC, V54, P273
[6]   Effect of pressure toasting on the rumen degradability and intestinal digestibility of whole and broken peas, lupins and faba beans and a mixture of these feedstuffs [J].
Goelema, JO ;
Spreeuwenberg, MAM ;
Hof, G ;
van der Poel, AFB ;
Tamminga, S .
ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 76 (1-2) :35-50
[7]   AN INVITRO METHOD FOR STUDYING DIGESTION IN THE PIG .2. COMPARISON WITH INVIVO ILEAL AND FECAL DIGESTIBILITIES [J].
GRAHAM, H ;
LOWGREN, W ;
AMAN, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 1989, 61 (03) :689-698
[8]   Multiphasic analysis of gas production kinetics for in vitro fermentation of ruminant feeds [J].
Groot, JCJ ;
Cone, JW ;
Williams, BA ;
Debersaques, FMA ;
Lantinga, EA .
ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 64 (01) :77-89
[9]  
HOUDIJK JGM, 1998, THESIS AGR U WAGENIN
[10]   EFFECT OF DIETARY FIBER ON MICROBIAL ACTIVITY AND MICROBIAL GAS-PRODUCTION IN VARIOUS REGIONS OF THE GASTROINTESTINAL-TRACT OF PIGS [J].
JENSEN, BB ;
JORGENSEN, H .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1994, 60 (06) :1897-1904