Impact of mammalian enzyme pretreatment on the fermentability of carbohydrate-rich feedstuffs

被引:23
作者
Bauer, E
Williams, BA
Voigt, C
Mosenthin, R
Verstegen, MWA
机构
[1] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Anim Nutr Grp, Wageningen Inst Anim Sci, NL-6709 PG Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Hohenheim, Inst Anim Nutr, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
carbohydrates; chyme; enzyme pretreatment; fermentation kinetics; fermentability; pig; small intestine; large intestine; cumulative gas production;
D O I
10.1002/jsfa.1293
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Several carbohydrate-rich substrates (spent brewer's grains, potato peel, potato starch, wheat bran, sugarbeet pulp and a maize-based standard diet for pigs) were pretreated with digestive enzymes, and the in vitro fermentability of these treated substrates and their untreated counterparts was assessed using the cumulative gas production technique. A comparison was also made between the enzyme-treated (ET) and untreated (UT) standard diet for pigs, and chyme which originated from pigs fed that diet, to determine whether the enzyme treatment resulted in material with similar fermentability to that reaching the large intestine in vivo. The enzyme pretreatment was performed according to a modified in vitro method of Babinszky et al (J Sci Food Agric 50:173-178 (1990)). Generally, it was shown that the fermentabilities of the ET and UT substrates were different. There was also a significant difference between the fermentation characteristics of the ET diet and chyme. Chyme produced less gas (P < 0.05), and the time at which half of the gas had been produced (C) occurred later (P < 0.05). The maximum rate of fermentation (R-M) was slower for chyme (P < 0.05). Fermentation of chyme led to more ammonia (P < 0.05) and a tendency to more volatile fatty acids at the end of fermentation. These differences in fermentability of the ET diet and chyme (from pigs fed the same diet) may be the result of differences which relate purely to the action of the enzymes chosen to work in vitro, compared with those which are actually present in vivo. However, the results also suggest that it is not only enzymatic digestion which is occurring in the small intestine. This is an important consideration when using ileal techniques to determine digestibility of feedstuffs. (C) 2003 Society of Chemical Industry.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 214
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[21]  
*SAS, 1989, SAS STAT US GUID VER, V2
[22]   ANTIBIOTICS IN FEED, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO PIGS - A VETERINARY VIEWPOINT [J].
SMITH, WJ .
ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1993, 45 (01) :57-64
[23]  
SOUFFRANT WB, 1991, EAAP PUBLIC, V54, P147
[24]   A SIMPLE GAS-PRODUCTION METHOD USING A PRESSURE TRANSDUCER TO DETERMINE THE FERMENTATION KINETICS OF RUMINANT FEEDS [J].
THEODOROU, MK ;
WILLIAMS, BA ;
DHANOA, MS ;
MCALLAN, AB ;
FRANCE, J .
ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1994, 48 (3-4) :185-197
[25]  
Van Soest P. J., 1994, Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant, V2nd, DOI [DOI 10.7591/9781501732355, 10.7591/9781501732355]
[26]  
VAN SOEST P. J., 1972, AGR HDB, V379
[27]  
VANLEEUWEN P, 1988, DIGESTIVE PHYSL PIG, P289
[28]   THE USE OF CUMULATIVE GAS-PRODUCTION TO DETERMINE THE EFFECT OF STEAM EXPLOSION ON THE FERMENTABILITY OF 2 SUBSTRATES WITH DIFFERENT CELL-WALL QUALITY [J].
WILLIAMS, BA ;
VANDERPEEL, AFB ;
BEER, H ;
TAMMINGA, S .
JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 1995, 69 (01) :33-39
[29]  
Williams BA, 2001, NUTR RES REV, V14, P207, DOI 10.1079/NRR200127
[30]  
Zoetendal EG, 1998, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V64, P3854