Tailored fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide compared with marrow-supported high-dose chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for high-risk breast cancer:: a randomised trial

被引:205
作者
Bergh, J
Wiklund, T
Erikstein, B
Lidbrink, E
Lindman, H
Malmström, P
Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, P
Bengtsson, NO
Söderlund, G
Anker, G
Wist, E
Ottosson, S
Salminen, E
Ljungman, P
Holte, H
Nilsson, J
Blomqvist, C
Wilking, N
机构
[1] Karolinska Hosp, Radiumhemmet, S-10401 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Univ Helsinki Hosp, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Norwegian Radium Hosp, Oslo, Norway
[4] Soder Sjukhuset, S-10064 Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Univ Uppsala, Akad Sjukhuset, Dept Oncol, Uppsala, Sweden
[6] Univ Hosp, Lund, Sweden
[7] Tampere Univ Hosp, Tampere, Finland
[8] Univ Hosp, Umea, Sweden
[9] Univ Hosp, Linkoping, Sweden
[10] Haukeland Univ Hosp, N-5021 Bergen, Norway
[11] Ulluval Univ Hosp, Gothenburg, Sweden
[12] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, S-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
[13] Turku Univ Hosp, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland
[14] Huddinge Univ Hosp, Uppsala, Sweden
[15] Reg Oncol Ctr, Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02841-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Chemotherapy drug distribution varies greatly among individual patients. Therefore, we developed an individualised fluorouracil. epirubicin, cyclophosphamide (FEC) regimen to improve outcomes in patients with high-risk early breast cancer. We then did a randomised trial to compare this individually tailored FEC regimen with conventional adjuvant chemotherapy followed by consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy with stem-cell support. Methods 525 women younger than 60 years of age with highrisk primary breast cancer were randomised after surgery to receive nine cycles of tailored FEC to haematological equitoxicity with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support (n=251), or three cycles of FEC at standard doses followed by high-dose chemotherapy with cyctophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin (CTCb), and peripheral-blood stem-cell or bone-marrow support (n=274). Both groups received locoregional radiation therapy and tamoxifen for 5 years. The primary outcome measure was relapse-free survival, and analysis was by intention to treat. Findings At a median follow-up of 34.3 months, there were 81 breast-cancer relapses in the tailored FEC group versus 113 in the CTCb group (double triangular method p=0.04). 60 deaths occurred in the tailored FEC group and 82 in the CTCb group (log-rank p=0.12). Patients in the CTCb group experienced more grade 3 or 4 acute toxicity compared with the tailored FEC group (p<0.0001). Two treatment-related deaths (0.7%) occurred in the CTCb group. Six patients in the tailored FEC group developed acute myeloid leukaemia and three developed myelodysplastic syndrome. Interpretation Tailored FEC with G-CSF support resulted in a significantly improved relapse-free survival and fewer grade 3 and 4 toxicities compared with marrow-supported high-dose chemotherapy with CTCb as adjuvant therapy of women with high-risk primary breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1384 / 1391
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [31] Conventional-dose chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for metastatic breast cancer.
    Stadtmauer, EA
    O'Neill, A
    Goldstein, LJ
    Crilley, PA
    Mangan, KF
    Ingle, JN
    Brodsky, I
    Martino, S
    Lazarus, HM
    Erban, JK
    Sickles, C
    Glick, JH
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (15) : 1069 - 1076
  • [32] TRAVIS L, 1999, P 35 ANN M AM SOC CL
  • [33] 2ND MALIGNANCIES FOLLOWING CMF-BASED ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY IN RESECTABLE BREAST-CANCER
    VALAGUSSA, P
    MOLITERNI, A
    TERENZIANI, M
    ZAMBETTI, M
    BONADONNA, G
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1994, 5 (09) : 803 - 808
  • [34] Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor enhances bone marrow stem cell damage caused by repeated administration of cytotoxic agents
    van Os, R
    Robinson, S
    Sheridan, T
    Mislow, JMK
    Dawes, D
    Mauch, PM
    [J]. BLOOD, 1998, 92 (06) : 1950 - 1956
  • [35] Whitehead J., 1992, The design and analysis of sequential clinical trials