Wavelet regression model for short-term streamflow forecasting

被引:97
作者
Kisi, Ozgur [1 ]
机构
[1] Erciyes Univ, Fac Engn, Civil Eng Dept, Hydraul Div, TR-38039 Kayseri, Turkey
关键词
Streamflow; Wavelet regression; Neural networks; ARMA; Forecasting; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.06.013
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Wavelet regression (WR) technique is proposed for short-term streamflow forecasting in this study. The WR model is improved combining two methods, discrete wavelet transform and linear regression model. The proposed model is applied to the daily streamflow data of two stations, Karabuk and Derecilcviran, on the Filyos River in the Western Black Sea region of Turkey. Root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE) and correlation coefficient (R) statistics are used for evaluating the accuracy of the WR models. In the first part of the study, the accuracy of the WR models is compared with the artificial neural network (ANN) and autoregressive moving average (ARMA) models in 1-day ahead streamflow forecasting. Comparison results reveal that the WR model performs better than the ANN and ARMA models. The ARMA model is also found to be slightly better than the ANN. For the Karabuk and Derecikviran stations, it was found that WR models with RMSE = 8.48 m(3)/s, MAE = 2.46 m(3)/s, R = 0.978 and RMSE = 33.3 m(3)/s, MAE = 10.2 m(3)/s, R = 0.976 in the validation stage are superior in forecasting 1-day ahead streamflows than the most accurate ARMA models with RMSE = 13.5 m(3)/s, MAE = 3.44 m(3)/s, R = 0.942 and RMSE = 46.5 m(3)/s, MAE = 13.2 m(3)/s, R = 0.953, respectively. In the second part of study, WR and ANN models are compared in 2- and 3-day ahead streamflow forecasting. Based on the comparison results, WR models are found to be more accurate than the ANN models. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:344 / 353
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION
    AKAIKE, H
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) : 716 - 723
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2003, Nat. Sci
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1994, Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation
  • [4] Rainfall-runoff modelling using artificial neural networks technique: a Blue Nile catchment case study
    Antar, MA
    Elassiouti, I
    Allam, MN
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2006, 20 (05) : 1201 - 1216
  • [5] A counterpropagation fuzzy-neural network modeling approach to real time streamflow prediction
    Chang, FJ
    Chen, YC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2001, 245 (1-4) : 153 - 164
  • [6] Comparison of ice-affected streamflow estimates computed using artificial neural networks and multiple regression techniques
    Chokmani, Karem
    Ouarda, Taha B. M. J.
    Hamilton, Stuart
    Ghedira, M. Hosni
    Gingras, Hugo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2008, 349 (3-4) : 383 - 396
  • [7] Application of wavelet-based multi-model Kalman filters to real-time flood forecasting
    Chou, CM
    Wang, RY
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2004, 18 (05) : 987 - 1008
  • [8] On-line estimation of unit hydrographs using the wavelet-based LMS algorithm
    Chou, CM
    Wang, RY
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2002, 47 (05): : 721 - 738
  • [9] Cigizoglu HK, 2005, NORD HYDROL, V36, P49
  • [10] Wavelet analysis of variability in annual Canadian streamflows
    Coulibaly, P
    Burn, DH
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2004, 40 (03) : W031051 - W0310514