Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance

被引:1306
作者
Chen, Sining
Parmigiani, Giovanni
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth Sci, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Oncol Biostat & Pathol, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2006.09.1066
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Genetic counseling is now routinely offered to individuals at high risk of carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Risk prediction provided by the counselor requires reliable estimates of the mutation penetrance. Such penetrance has been investigated by studies worldwide. The reported estimates vary. To facilitate clinical management and counseling of the at-risk population, we address this issue through a meta-analysis. Methods We conducted a literature search on PubMed and selected studies that had nonoverlapping patient data, contained genotyping information, used statistical methods that account for the ascertainment, and reported risks in a useable format. We subsequently combined the published estimates using the DerSimonian and Laird random effects modeling approach. Results Ten studies were eligible under the selection criteria. Between-study heterogeneity was observed. Study population, mutation type, design, and estimation methods did not seem to be systematic sources of heterogeneity. Meta-analytic mean cumulative cancer risks for mutation carriers at age 70 years were as follows: breast cancer risk of 57% (95% CI, 47% to 66%) for BRCA1 and 49% ( 95% CI, 40% to 57%) for BRCA2 mutation carriers; and ovarian cancer risk of 40% ( 95% CI, 35% to 46%) for BRCA1 and 18% ( 95% CI, 13% to 23%) for BRCA2 mutation carriers. We also report the prospective risks of developing cancer for currently asymptomatic carriers. Conclusion This article provides a set of risk estimates for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers that can be used by counselors and clinicians who are interested in advising patients based on a comprehensive set of studies rather than one specific study.
引用
收藏
页码:1329 / 1333
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history:: A combined analysis of 22 studies
    Antoniou, A
    Pharoah, PDP
    Narod, S
    Risch, HA
    Eyfjord, JE
    Hopper, JL
    Loman, N
    Olsson, H
    Johannsson, O
    Borg, Å
    Pasini, B
    Radice, P
    Manoukian, S
    Eccles, DM
    Tang, N
    Olah, E
    Anton-Culver, H
    Warner, E
    Lubinski, J
    Gronwald, J
    Gorski, B
    Tulinius, H
    Thorlacius, S
    Eerola, H
    Nevanlinna, H
    Syrjäkoski, K
    Kallioniemi, OP
    Thompson, D
    Evans, C
    Peto, J
    Lalloo, F
    Evans, DG
    Easton, DF
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2003, 72 (05) : 1117 - 1130
  • [2] Breast and ovarian cancer risks to carriers of the BRCA1 5382insC and 185delAG and BRCA2 6174delT mutations:: a combined analysis of 22 population based studies
    Antoniou, AC
    Pharoah, PDP
    Narod, S
    Risch, HA
    Eyfjord, JE
    Hopper, JL
    Olsson, H
    Johannsson, O
    Borg, Å
    Pasini, B
    Radice, P
    Manoukian, S
    Eccles, DM
    Tang, N
    Olah, E
    Anton-Culver, H
    Warner, E
    Lubinski, J
    Gronwald, J
    Gorski, B
    Tulinius, H
    Thorlacius, S
    Eerola, H
    Nevanlinna, H
    Syrjäkoski, K
    Kallioniemi, OP
    Thompson, D
    Evans, C
    Peto, J
    Lalloo, F
    Evans, DG
    Easton, DF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2005, 42 (07) : 602 - 603
  • [3] The BOADICEA model of genetic susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer
    Antoniou, AC
    Pharoah, PPD
    Smith, P
    Easton, DF
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 91 (08) : 1580 - 1590
  • [4] Begg CB, 2002, J NATL CANCER I, V94, P1221
  • [5] Chen S., 2004, Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol., V3, P1, DOI DOI 10.2202/1544-6115.1063
  • [6] Characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a large United States sample
    Chen, SN
    Iversen, ES
    Friebel, T
    Finkelstein, D
    Weber, BL
    Eisen, A
    Peterson, LE
    Schildkraut, JM
    Isaacs, C
    Peshkin, BN
    Corio, C
    Leondaridis, L
    Tomlinson, G
    Dutsm, D
    Kerber, R
    Amos, CI
    Strong, LC
    Berry, DA
    Euthus, DM
    Parmigiani, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (06) : 863 - 871
  • [7] CLAUS EB, 1994, CANCER, V73, P643, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19940201)73:3<643::AID-CNCR2820730323>3.0.CO
  • [8] 2-5
  • [9] METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS
    DERSIMONIAN, R
    LAIRD, N
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03): : 177 - 188
  • [10] Application of breast cancer risk prediction models in clinical practice
    Domchek, SM
    Eisen, A
    Calzone, K
    Stopfer, J
    Blackwood, A
    Weber, BL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (04) : 593 - 601