Uptake of a prenatal screening test: the role of healthcare professionals' attitudes towards the test

被引:29
作者
Dormandy, E [1 ]
Marteau, TM [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat, Dept Psychol, Hlth Psychol Sect, London SE1 9RT, England
关键词
Down syndrome screening; healthcare professionals' attitudes; screening uptake;
D O I
10.1002/pd.1028
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate the association between healthcare professionals' attitudes towards prenatal Down syndrome screening and screening uptake in the women who consult them. Methods The attitudes of 71 midwives and 18 obstetricians towards Down syndrome screening and screening uptake in the women who consulted them were assessed at two UK hospitals where uptake rates of Down syndrome screening differed (26 vs 61%). Results Healthcare professionals based at the hospital with higher screening uptake had more positive attitudes towards Down syndrome screening than healthcare professionals based at the hospital with lower screening uptake (19 vs 17, p = 0.03). Pooling across hospitals, obstetricians had more positive attitudes than midwives (20 vs 17, p = 0.004). In a sub-group of women who discussed screening with one healthcare professional, there was no significant association between individual healthcare professionals' attitudes and screening uptake (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.13, p = 0.51). Conclusion In this study powered to detect a correlation of 0.5 and over (i.e. a large effect), healthcare professionals' attitudes towards screening were unrelated to uptake of screening in the women consulting them. It remains to be determined if a smaller effect exists. The observed association between healthcare professionals' attitudes and uptake rates by hospitals raises the question of whether healthcare professionals' attitudes might influence systems of care, not just communication with pregnant women. Copyright (C) 2004 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:864 / 868
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]  
2-M
[12]   Has the medicalisation of childbirth gone too far? [J].
Johanson, R ;
Newburn, M ;
Macfarlane, A .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7342) :892-895
[13]   THE ATTITUDES OF MIDWIVES TO MATERNAL SERUM SCREENING FROM DOWNS-SYNDROME [J].
KHALID, L ;
PRICE, SM ;
BARROW, M .
PUBLIC HEALTH, 1994, 108 (02) :131-136
[14]   Protective steering: a grounded theory study of the processes by which midwives facilitate informed choices during pregnancy [J].
Levy, V .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1999, 29 (01) :104-112
[15]   USING PATIENT AND GENERAL-PRACTICE CHARACTERISTICS TO EXPLAIN VARIATIONS IN CEI CERVICAL SMEAR UPTAKES RATES [J].
MAJEED, FA ;
COOK, DG ;
ANDERSON, HR ;
HILTON, S ;
BUNN, S ;
STONES, C .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 308 (6939) :1272-1276
[16]  
MARTEAU TM, 1993, J REPROD INFANT PSYC, V11, P3
[17]  
*NAT SCREEN COMM, 2000, 2 REP UK NAT SCREEN
[18]  
SCHUMAN AN, 1993, J REPROD INFANT PSYC, V11, P115
[19]  
SIMPSON W, 1999, HLTH TECHNOL ASSESS, V3
[20]   Uptake and acceptability of antenatal HIV testing: randomised controlled trial of different methods of offering the test [J].
Simpson, WM ;
Johnstone, FD ;
Boyd, FM ;
Goldberg, DJ ;
Hart, GJ ;
Prescott, RJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 316 (7127) :262-267