Efficacy of omeprazole for the treatment of symptomatic acid reflux disease without esophagitis

被引:92
作者
Richter, JE
Peura, D
Benjamin, SB
Joelsson, B
Whipple, J
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Gastroenterol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[3] Georgetown Univ, Med Ctr, Div Gastroenterol, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[4] AstraZeneca LP, Wayne, PA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.160.12.1810
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Up to three quarters of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have symptoms, such as heartburn, but no macroscopic evidence of erosive esophagitis, making symptomatic GERD a common clinical problem in the primary care setting. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of omeprazole, 20 mg once daily; omeprazole, 10 mg once daily; and placebo in the treatment of symptomatic GERD without erosive esophagitis. Methods: Patients with a history of heartburn (greater than or equal to 12 months) and episodes of moderate to severe heartburn on 4 or more of the 7 days before endoscopy were eligible to participate in this dr-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The absence of erosive esophagitis was established through endoscopy. Eligible patients were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment groups: omeprazole, 20 mg once daily; omeprazole, 10 mg once daily; or placebo. Patients were assessed at weeks 2 and 4. The efficacy of omeprazole for the treatment of heartburn was determined mainly through the following diary card data: daily resolution of heartburn and complete resolution of heartburn every day during 1 week of treatment. The efficacy of omeprazole for the treatment of acid regurgitation, dysphagia, epigastric pain, and nausea was also assessed. Results: Of 359 randomized patients, 355 were included in the statistical analysis (intention-to-treat population). Daily proportions of patients with no heartburn were consistently greater in the 20-mg omeprazole group (62%, day 7; 74%, day 27) than in the 10-mg omeprazole group (41%, day 7; 49%, day 27) or the placebo group (14%, day 7; 23%; day 27). Complete resolution of heartburn every day during the last treatment week was significantly (P less than or equal to.002) higher in the 20-mg omeprazole group (48%) than in the 10-mg omeprazole (27%) or placebo (5%) group. Omeprazole was significantly (P less than or equal to.003) more effective than placebo for the treatment of acid regurgitation, dysphagia, epigastric pain, and nausea. Conclusions: Patients with symptomatic GERD require profound acid suppression to achieve symptomatic relief. Omeprazole, 20 mg once daily, was superior to omeprazole, 10 mg once daily, and to placebo in providing early and sustained resolution of heartburn, as well as treatment of other troublesome GERD symptoms.
引用
收藏
页码:1810 / 1816
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], BR J CLIN RES
[2]  
BARDHAN KD, 1995, ALIMENT PHARM THERAP, V9, P145
[3]   Omeprazole is more effective than cimetidine for the relief of all grades of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-associated heartburn, irrespective of the presence or absence of endoscopic oesophagitis [J].
Bate, CM ;
Green, JRB ;
Axon, ATR ;
Murray, FE ;
Tildesley, G ;
Emmas, CE ;
Taylor, MD .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1997, 11 (04) :755-763
[4]   ROLE OF GASTRIC-ACID SUPPRESSION IN THE TREATMENT OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE [J].
BELL, NJV ;
HUNT, RH .
GUT, 1992, 33 (01) :118-124
[5]  
Carlsson R, 1997, GUT, V41, pA57
[6]  
CARNEY CN, 1981, LAB INVEST, V45, P198
[7]  
CHAL KL, 1995, BRIT J CLIN PRACT, V49, P73
[8]   Speed of healing and symptom relief in grade II to IV gastroesophageal reflux disease: A meta-analysis [J].
Chiba, N ;
DeGara, CJ ;
Wilkinson, JM ;
Hunt, RH .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1997, 112 (06) :1798-1810
[9]   Heartburn - A serious symptom [J].
Cohen, S ;
Parkman, HP .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (11) :878-879
[10]   GUIDELINES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE [J].
DEVAULT, KR ;
CASTELL, DO .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1995, 155 (20) :2165-2173