Objective response detection in an electroencephalogram during somatosensory stimulation

被引:36
作者
Simpson, DM [1 ]
Tierra-Criollo, CJ [1 ]
Leite, RT [1 ]
Zayen, EJB [1 ]
Infantosi, AFC [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Programa Engn Biomed, COPPE, BR-21945970 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
关键词
biological signal processing; electroencephalography; evoked potentials; spectral estimation; phase spectrum; coherence;
D O I
10.1114/1.1305530
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Techniques for objective response detection aim to identify the presence of evoked potentials based purely on statistical principles. They have been shown to be potentially more sensitive than the conventional approach of subjective evaluation by experienced clinicians and could be of great clinical use. Three such techniques to detect changes in an electroencephalogram (EEG) synchronous with the stimuli, namely, magnitude-squared coherence (MSC), the phase-synchrony measure (PSM) and the spectral F test (SFT) were applied to EEG signals of 12 normal subjects under conventional somatosensory pulse stimulation to the tibial nerve. The SFT, which uses only the power spectrum, showed the poorest performance, while the PSM, based only on the phase spectrum, gave results almost as good as those of the MSG, which uses both phase and power spectra. With the latter two techniques, stimulus responses were evident in the frequency range of 20-80 Hz in all subjects after 200 stimuli (5 Hz stimulus frequency), whereas for visual recognition at least 500 stimuli are usually applied. Based on these results and on simulations, the phase-based techniques appear promising for the automated detection and monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials. (C) 2000 Biomedical Engineering Society. [S0090-6964(00)00606-8].
引用
收藏
页码:691 / 698
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   SIGNAL-DETECTION IN AVERAGED EVOKED-POTENTIALS - MONTE-CARLO COMPARISON OF THE SENSITIVITY OF DIFFERENT METHODS [J].
ACHIM, A .
EVOKED POTENTIALS-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 96 (06) :574-584
[2]   PHASE COHERENCE OF THE MIDDLE-LATENCY RESPONSE IN THE ELDERLY [J].
ALI, AA ;
JERGER, J .
SCANDINAVIAN AUDIOLOGY, 1992, 21 (03) :187-194
[3]  
AOYAGI M, 1993, ACTA OTO-LARYNGOL, P82
[4]  
BENDAT JS, 1986, RANDOM DATA ANAL MEA, P586
[5]  
CHIAPPA KH, 1997, EVOLKED POTENTIALS C, P719
[6]  
COELHO FC, 1995, C P IEEE ENG MED BIO
[7]  
DASILVA L, 1998, ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAP, P947
[8]   OBJECTIVE DETECTION OF 40-HZ AUDITORY-EVOKED POTENTIALS - PHASE COHERENCE VS MAGNITUDE-SQUARED COHERENCE [J].
DOBIE, RA ;
WILSON, MJ .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 92 (05) :405-413
[9]   OBJECTIVE VERSUS HUMAN OBSERVER DETECTION OF 40-HZ AUDITORY-EVOKED POTENTIALS [J].
DOBIE, RA ;
WILSON, MJ .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1995, 97 (05) :3042-3050
[10]   OPTIMAL SMOOTHING OF COHERENCE ESTIMATES [J].
DOBIE, RA ;
WILSON, MJ .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 80 (03) :194-200