Public regulation as a substitute for trust in quality food markets:: What if the trust substitute cannot be fully trusted?

被引:45
作者
Anania, G [1 ]
Nisticò, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calabria, Dipartimento Econ & Stat, I-87036 Arcavacata Di Rende, Cs, Italy
来源
JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL AND THEORETICAL ECONOMICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE GESAMTE STAATSWISSENSCHAFT | 2004年 / 160卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1628/0932456042776113
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 [经济学];
摘要
Most food products can be classified as credence goods, and regulations exist to provide consumers with a substitute for the lacking information and trust. Rather than having no regulation in place, producers of high-quality goods are better off when a compromise is reached that leads to an imperfect regulation. Some of the producers of low-quality goods benefit by cheating under a not fully credible regulation. Even producers of low-quality goods who will never label their products as being of high quality may profit from the introduction of an imperfect regulation.
引用
收藏
页码:681 / 701
页数:21
相关论文
共 53 条
[51]
COMPETITION IN A MARKET FOR INFORMED EXPERTS SERVICES [J].
WOLINSKY, A .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1993, 24 (03) :380-388
[52]
WOLINSKY A, 1995, J INST THEOR ECON, V151, P117
[53]
ZAGO AM, 2004, IN PRESS J AGR RESOU, V29