Public regulation as a substitute for trust in quality food markets:: What if the trust substitute cannot be fully trusted?
被引:45
作者:
Anania, G
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Calabria, Dipartimento Econ & Stat, I-87036 Arcavacata Di Rende, Cs, ItalyUniv Calabria, Dipartimento Econ & Stat, I-87036 Arcavacata Di Rende, Cs, Italy
Anania, G
[1
]
Nisticò, R
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Calabria, Dipartimento Econ & Stat, I-87036 Arcavacata Di Rende, Cs, ItalyUniv Calabria, Dipartimento Econ & Stat, I-87036 Arcavacata Di Rende, Cs, Italy
Nisticò, R
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Calabria, Dipartimento Econ & Stat, I-87036 Arcavacata Di Rende, Cs, Italy
来源:
JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL AND THEORETICAL ECONOMICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE GESAMTE STAATSWISSENSCHAFT
|
2004年
/
160卷
/
04期
关键词:
D O I:
10.1628/0932456042776113
中图分类号:
F [经济];
学科分类号:
02 [经济学];
摘要:
Most food products can be classified as credence goods, and regulations exist to provide consumers with a substitute for the lacking information and trust. Rather than having no regulation in place, producers of high-quality goods are better off when a compromise is reached that leads to an imperfect regulation. Some of the producers of low-quality goods benefit by cheating under a not fully credible regulation. Even producers of low-quality goods who will never label their products as being of high quality may profit from the introduction of an imperfect regulation.