Simulation of maize yield under water stress with the EPICphase and CROPWAT models

被引:88
作者
Cavero, J
Farre, I
Debaeke, P
Faci, JM
机构
[1] CSIC, Estac Expt Aula Dei, Dep Genet & Prod Vegetal, E-50080 Zaragoza, Spain
[2] DGA, Serv Invest Agroalimentaria, Unidad Suelos & Riegos, Zaragoza 50080, Spain
[3] INRA, Stn Agron, F-31326 Castanet Tolosan, France
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj2000.924679x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Models that simulate the effects of water stress on crop yield ran be valuable tools in irrigation, We evaluated the crop growth simulation model EPICphase and the model CROPWAT on their ability to simulate maize (Zea mays L.) grain yield reduction caused by water stress under semiarid conditions. The simulation of evapotranspiration (ET), harvest index (HI), Leaf area index (LAI), and final biomass was also evaluated. Data from three held experiments were used to test the models. In one sprinkler-irrigated experiment, different water amounts (0-592 mm) were applied, producing a continuous water deficit. The other two experiments were flood-irrigated and water stress was imposed at given development stages of maize. EPICphase simulated the ET with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 40 mm. The regression of the EPICphase simulated vs. measured values of tit and yield had intercepts that were not significantly different from ii and slopes not different from 1. EPICphase overestimated the biomass in the more water-stressed treatments (intercept of simulated vs. measured values = 5.25 t ha(-1)) due to overestimation of LAI, Modifications of EPICphase relative to the effect of water stress on LAI growth and on the light extinction coefficient improved the simulations of LAI, biomass, HI, and yield. CROPWAT calculated maize grain yield with a RMSE of 14% but overestimated ET in the flood-irrigated treatments (bias = 58 mm and 31 mm). Better simulation of ET by EPICphase makes this model more consistent for calculating yield reduction due to water stress.
引用
收藏
页码:679 / 690
页数:12
相关论文
共 65 条
[31]  
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 1979, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper
[32]   MOISTURE DEFICITS AND GRAIN-SORGHUM PERFORMANCE - DROUGHT STRESS CONDITIONING [J].
GARRITY, DP ;
SULLIVAN, CY ;
WATTS, DG .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1983, 75 (06) :997-1004
[33]  
*GOLD SOFTW INC, 1995, SURF US GUID
[34]  
GORDON WB, 1995, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V50, P395
[35]   LINE SOURCE SPRINKLER FOR CONTINUOUS VARIABLE IRRIGATION-CROP PRODUCTION STUDIES [J].
HANKS, RJ ;
KELLER, J ;
RASMUSSEN, VP ;
WILSON, GD .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1976, 40 (03) :426-429
[36]  
Howell T. A., 1990, AGRONOMY MONOGRAPH, V30, P391, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2018.11.176
[37]  
HOWELL TA, 1989, T ASAE, V32, P147, DOI 10.13031/2013.30974
[38]   TIMING OF THE FIRST IRRIGATION IN CORN AND WATER-STRESS CONDITIONING [J].
JAMA, AO ;
OTTMAN, MJ .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1993, 85 (06) :1159-1164
[39]  
Jones CA., 1986, CERES-Maize: a simulation model of maize growth and development
[40]   SUNFLOWER SIMULATION USING THE EPIC AND ALMANAC MODELS [J].
KINIRY, JR ;
BLANCHET, R ;
WILLIAMS, JR ;
TEXIER, V ;
JONES, CA ;
CABELGUENNE, M .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1992, 30 (3-4) :403-423