Experimental procedures for entanglement verification

被引:82
作者
van Enk, S. J. [1 ]
Lutkenhaus, N.
Kimble, H. J.
机构
[1] Univ Oregon, Dept Phys, Oregon Ctr Opt, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[2] Univ Oregon, Inst Theoret Sci, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[3] CALTECH, Inst Quantum Informat, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[4] Univ Waterloo, Inst Quantrum Comp, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[5] Univ Waterloo, Dept Phys & Astron, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[6] CALTECH, Norman Bridge Lab Phys 12 33, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW A | 2007年 / 75卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevA.75.052318
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
We give an overview of different types of entanglement that can be generated in experiments, as well as of various protocols that can be used to verify or quantify entanglement. We propose several criteria that, we argue, should be applied to experimental entanglement verification procedures. Explicit examples demonstrate that not following these criteria will tend to result in overestimating the amount of entanglement generated in an experiment or in inferring entanglement when there is none. We distinguish protocols meant to refute or eliminate hidden-variable models from those meant to verify entanglement.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 76 条
[71]   Entanglement versus Bell violations and their behavior under local filtering operations [J].
Verstraete, F ;
Wolf, MM .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2002, 89 (17) :170401/1-170401/4
[72]   Experimental determination of entanglement with a single measurement [J].
Walborn, SP ;
Ribeiro, PHS ;
Davidovich, L ;
Mintert, F ;
Buchleitner, A .
NATURE, 2006, 440 (7087) :1022-1024
[73]   Violation of Bell's inequality under strict Einstein locality conditions [J].
Weihs, G ;
Jennewein, T ;
Simon, C ;
Weinfurter, H ;
Zeilinger, A .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1998, 81 (23) :5039-5043
[74]   QUANTUM STATES WITH EINSTEIN-PODOLSKY-ROSEN CORRELATIONS ADMITTING A HIDDEN-VARIABLE MODEL [J].
WERNER, RF .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 1989, 40 (08) :4277-4281
[75]   Defending continuous variable teleportation: why a laser is a clock, not a quantum channel [J].
Wiseman, HM .
JOURNAL OF OPTICS B-QUANTUM AND SEMICLASSICAL OPTICS, 2004, 6 (08) :S849-S859
[76]   Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits [J].
Wootters, WK .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1998, 80 (10) :2245-2248