Applications of nestedness analyses to biodiversity conservation in developing landscapes

被引:29
作者
Fleishman, Erica
Donnelly, Roarke
Fay, John P.
Reeves, Rick
机构
[1] Oglethorpe Univ, Dept Biol, Atlanta, GA 30319 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Ctr Conservat Biol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Natl Ctr Ecol Anal & Synth, Santa Barbara, CA 93101 USA
关键词
assemblage structure; conservation; detection probabilities; environmental gradient; species richness; urbanization; ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY; SPECIES RICHNESS; GREAT-BASIN; EXURBAN DEVELOPMENT; BETA-DIVERSITY; PATTERNS; BIRDS; SUBSETS; BIOGEOGRAPHY; ASSEMBLAGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.002
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
We provide an overview of how nestedness analyses of presence/absence data might direct conservation and land-use planning in developing landscapes. We describe two nestedness statistics, the percent of perfect nestedness (%PN) and the relative nestedness index C, which statistically and directly test whether assemblages of organisms are nested by gradients relevant to conservation practice. For cases in which assemblages are nested by such gradients, our new freeware program allows users to determine the line of smoothest transition among species-specific thresholds of occurrence. Policy makers, urban planners, and resource managers could use this curve to set specific targets for environmental attributes that are affected by land use (e.g., maximum percent of impervious surface) and are correlated with species richness or life history traits. We use case studies of birds across an urban gradient and birds and butterflies in an exurban landscape to illustrate the range of conservation and land-use issues that nestedness analyses might address at relatively low cost. We also discuss how nestedness analyses relate to other statistical techniques relevant to the analysis of presence/absence data. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 281
页数:11
相关论文
共 103 条
[91]  
Scott J.A., 1986, BUTTERFLIES N AM
[92]   Using point counts to establish conservation priorities: How many visits are optimal? [J].
Siegel, RB ;
Desante, DF ;
Nott, MP .
JOURNAL OF FIELD ORNITHOLOGY, 2001, 72 (02) :228-235
[93]   Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: Is single-species management passe in the landscape era? [J].
Simberloff, D .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1998, 83 (03) :247-257
[94]   Indicator species and the problem of spatial inconsistency in nestedness patterns [J].
Sætersdal, M ;
Gjerde, I ;
Blom, HH .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2005, 122 (02) :305-316
[95]   Improving precision and reducing bias in biological surveys: Estimating false-negative error rates [J].
Tyre, AJ ;
Tenhumberg, B ;
Field, SA ;
Niejalke, D ;
Parris, K ;
Possingham, HP .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2003, 13 (06) :1790-1801
[96]   Tracking fragmentation of natural communities and changes in land cover: Applications of landsat data for conservation in an urban landscape (Chicago wilderness) [J].
Wang, YQ ;
Moskovits, DK .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2001, 15 (04) :835-843
[97]  
Whitcomb R.F., 1981, FOREST ISLAND DYNAMI, P125
[98]   Conservation Biogeography:: assessment and prospect [J].
Whittaker, RJ ;
Araújo, MB ;
Paul, J ;
Ladle, RJ ;
Watson, JEM ;
Willis, KJ .
DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2005, 11 (01) :3-23
[99]   MEASURING BETA DIVERSITY WITH PRESENCE ABSENCE DATA [J].
WILSON, MV ;
SHMIDA, A .
JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1984, 72 (03) :1055-1064
[100]   Precision and bias of methods for estimating point survey detection probabilities [J].
Wintle, BA ;
McCarthy, MA ;
Parris, KM ;
Burgman, MA .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2004, 14 (03) :703-712