A microscope or a mirror?: A question of study validity regarding the use of dissertation citation analysis for evaluating research collections

被引：27

作者：

Beile, PM ^{[1
]}

Boote, DN ^{[1
]}

Killingsworth, EK ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Cent Florida, Orlando, FL 32816 USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP | 2004年 / 30卷 / 05期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1016/j.acalib.2004.06.001

中图分类号：

G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];

学科分类号：

1205 ; 120501 ;

摘要：

Use of dissertation citation analysis for collection evaluation was investigated. Analysis of 1842 education dissertation citations from three institutions suggests the assumption of doctoral student expertise in their use of the scholarly literature may be overstated. For purposes of developing research collections, dependence on dissertation citation analyses should proceed cautiously.

引用

页码：347 / 353

页数：7

共 41 条

[1]

[Anonymous], SCHOLARLY COMMUNICAT

[2]

BARRY C, 1997, J INFORMATION SCI, V23, P229

[3]

BROADUS RN, 1977, ADV LIBRARIANSHIP, V7, P328

[4]

BUTTLAR, INFORMATION SOURCES, V227

[5]

BUTTLAR, INFORMATION SOURCES, V242

[6] Information sources in library and information science doctoral research [J].

Buttlar, L .

LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH, 1999, 21 (02) :227-245

[7] The effect of the web on undergraduate citation behavior: A 2000 update [J].

Davis, PM .

COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, 2002, 63 (01) :53-60

[8]

Davis PM, 2001, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC, V52, P309, DOI 10.1002/1532-2890(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1069>3.0.CO

[9]

2-P

[10]

DIODATO, DICT BIBLIOMETRICS, V24

← 1 2 3 4 5 →