A microscope or a mirror?: A question of study validity regarding the use of dissertation citation analysis for evaluating research collections

被引:27
作者
Beile, PM [1 ]
Boote, DN [1 ]
Killingsworth, EK [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.acalib.2004.06.001
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Use of dissertation citation analysis for collection evaluation was investigated. Analysis of 1842 education dissertation citations from three institutions suggests the assumption of doctoral student expertise in their use of the scholarly literature may be overstated. For purposes of developing research collections, dependence on dissertation citation analyses should proceed cautiously.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 353
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
[21]  
HERUBEL, PHILOS DISSERTION BI, V65
[22]   PHILOSOPHY DISSERTATION BIBLIOGRAPHIES AND CITATIONS IN SERIALS EVALUATION [J].
HERUBEL, JPVM .
SERIALS LIBRARIAN, 1991, 20 (2-3) :65-73
[23]  
KOHL DF, 1986, RQ, V26, P206
[24]   Identifying uniform core journal titles for music libraries: A dissertation citation study [J].
Kuyper-Rushing, L .
COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, 1999, 60 (02) :153-163
[25]  
KUYPERRUSHING, IDENTIFYING UNIFORM, V162
[26]  
KUYPERRUSHING, IDENTIFYING UNIFORM, V161
[27]  
PAISLEY, FUTURE BIBLIOMETRICS, V287
[28]  
PAISLEY, FUTURE BIBLIOMETRICS, V28
[29]  
PERITZ, USE LIB FRADUATE STU, V11
[30]  
PERITZ BC, 1990, COLLECTION MANAGEMEN, V12, P11