Ropivacaine 0.2% versus bupivacaine 0.1% with fentanyl:: a double blind comparison for analgesia during labour

被引:16
作者
Dresner, M [1 ]
Freeman, J [1 ]
Calow, C [1 ]
Quinn, A [1 ]
Bamber, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Leeds Gen Infirm, Dept Anaesthet, Leeds LS1 3EX, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
anaesthetic techniques; regional; epidural; anaesthetics; local; ropivacaine; anaesthesia; obstetric;
D O I
10.1093/bja/85.6.826
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
We have performed a randomized, double-blind comparison of two epidural drug regimens for analgesia in labour. In the bupivacaine group (BUPIV), 101 healthy parturients received 0.1% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2 mug ml(-1). In the ropivacaine group (ROPIV), 102 women received 0.2% ropivacaine. Both groups received an initial loading dose of 15 ml, a continuous infusion of 8 ml h(-1), and top-ups of 10 ml. Breakthrough pain not responding to a routine top-up was treated with an 'escape' top-up of 10 mi 0.25% bupivacaine. The two groups were compared for complete analgesia at 30 min, routine and 'escape' top-up requirements, midwife assessment of analgesic efficacy, delivery mode, patient visual analogue scores (VAS) for first and second stage analgesia, overall satisfaction, and patient assessment of motor blockade. Patients receiving ropivacaine received fewer routine top-ups (median 1.0 vs. 2.0, P = 0.001) and fewer escape top-ups (9.8% vs. 21.8%, P = 0.02). The ropivacaine group was more likely to be pain free in the first stage (51% vs. 33.7%, P = 0.01). There were no significant differences in patients' assessment of motor block or mode of delivery between the groups. Pain relief and satisfaction scores from midwives and patients were consistently better in the ropivacaine group, but did not reach statistical significance.
引用
收藏
页码:826 / 829
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Continuous extradural infusion of ropivacaine 2 mg ml(-1) for pain relief during labour [J].
Benhamou, D ;
Hamza, J ;
Eledjam, JJ ;
Dailland, P ;
Palot, M ;
Seebacher, J ;
Milon, D ;
Heeroma, K .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1997, 78 (06) :748-750
[2]   COMPARISON OF EXTRADURAL ROPIVACAINE AND BUPIVACAINE [J].
BROCKWAY, MS ;
BANNISTER, J ;
MCCLURE, JH ;
MCKEOWN, D ;
WILDSMITH, JAW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1991, 66 (01) :31-37
[3]   A survey of epidural analgesia for labour in the United Kingdom [J].
Burnstein, R ;
Buckland, R ;
Pickett, JA .
ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 54 (07) :634-640
[4]   Relative potencies of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for analgesia in labour [J].
Capogna, G ;
Celleno, D ;
Fusco, P ;
Lyons, G ;
Columb, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 82 (03) :371-373
[5]   CONTINUOUS INFUSION EPIDURAL ANALGESIA DURING LABOR - A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF 0.0625-PERCENT BUPIVACAINE 0.0002-PERCENT FENTANYL VERSUS 0.125-PERCENT BUPIVACAINE [J].
CHESTNUT, DH ;
OWEN, CL ;
BATES, JN ;
OSTMAN, LG ;
CHOI, WW ;
GEIGER, MW .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1988, 68 (05) :754-759
[6]   RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF COMBINED SPINAL-EPIDURAL AND STANDARD EPIDURAL ANALGESIA IN LABOR [J].
COLLIS, RE ;
DAVIES, DWL ;
AVELING, W .
LANCET, 1995, 345 (8962) :1413-1416
[7]   Comparison of low-dose epidural with combined spinal-epidural analgesia for labour [J].
Dresner, M ;
Bamber, J ;
Calow, C ;
Freeman, J ;
Charlton, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 83 (05) :756-760
[8]   Extradural pain relief in labour: Bupivacaine sparing by extradural fentanyl is dose dependent [J].
Lyons, G ;
Columb, M ;
Hawthorne, L ;
Dresner, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1997, 78 (05) :493-497
[9]   A comparison between low-dose ropivacaine and bupivacaine at equianalgesic concentrations for epidural analgesia during the first stage of labor [J].
Parpaglioni, R ;
Capogna, G ;
Celleno, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2000, 9 (02) :83-86
[10]   Relative analgesic potencies of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in labor - Implications for therapeutic indexes [J].
Polley, LS ;
Columb, MO ;
Naughton, NN ;
Wagner, DS ;
van de Ven, CJM .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 90 (04) :944-950