A randomized, controlled, dose-guiding study of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran compared with standard therapy for the treatment of acute deep vein thrombosis:: THRIVE I

被引:135
作者
Eriksson, H
Wählander, K
Gustafsson, D
Welin, LT
Frison, L
Schulman, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Hosp, Coagulat Unit, Dept Haematol, S-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Med, S-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] AstraZeneca R&D, Molndal, Sweden
[4] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Chem & Transfus Med, S-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
dalteparin; deep vein thrombosis; hemorrhage; oral direct thrombin inhibitor; ximelagatran;
D O I
10.1046/j.1538-7836.2003.00034.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This randomized, controlled, multicentre study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran, compared with a low-molecular-weight heparin (dalteparin) followed by warfarin, in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower extremity. Patients with acute DVT received oral ximelagatran (24, 36, 48 or 60 mg twice daily) or dalteparin and warfarin for 2 weeks. Evaluation of paired venograms from 295 of 350 patients showed regression of the thrombus in 69% of patients treated with ximelagatran and 69% of patients treated with dalteparin and warfarin. Progression was observed in 8% and 3% of patients, respectively. Changes in thrombus size according to the Marder score were similar in all groups. Treatment discontinuation due to bleeding occurred in two patients receiving ximelagatran (24-and 36-mg groups) and in two patients receiving dalteparin and warfarin. Reduction in pain, edema and circumference of the affected leg was similar in all groups. Oral ximelagatran appears to be a promising alternative to current anticoagulant therapy to limit the progression of acute DVT, and it seems to possess a wide therapeutic window.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 47
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[21]  
JOHANSSON S, 2001, THROMB HAEMOST S, V86, pP784
[22]   Treatment of venous thrombosis with intravenous unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital as compared with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin administered at home [J].
Koopman, MMW ;
Prandoni, P ;
Piovella, F ;
Ockelford, PA ;
Brandjes, DPM ;
vanderMeer, J ;
Gallus, AS ;
Simonneau, G ;
Chesterman, CH ;
Prins, MH ;
Bossuyt, PMM ;
deHaes, H ;
vandenBelt, AGM ;
Sagnard, L ;
DAzemar, P ;
Buller, HR .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (11) :682-687
[23]  
LAGERSTEDT CI, 1985, LANCET, V2, P515
[24]   A comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin administered primarily at home with unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital for proximal deep-vein thrombosis [J].
Levine, M ;
Gent, M ;
Hirsh, J ;
Leclerc, J ;
Anderson, D ;
Weitz, J ;
Ginsberg, J ;
Turpie, AG ;
Demers, C ;
Kovacs, M ;
Geerts, W ;
Kassis, J ;
Desjardins, L ;
Cusson, J ;
Cruickshank, M ;
Powers, P ;
Brien, W ;
Haley, S ;
Willan, A .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (11) :677-681
[25]  
MARDER VJ, 1977, J LAB CLIN MED, V89, P1018
[26]  
PARENT F, 1993, THROMB HAEMOSTASIS, V70, P386
[27]  
Sarich TC, 2002, THROMB HAEMOSTASIS, V87, P300
[28]  
SCHIELE F, 1994, THROMB HAEMOSTASIS, V71, P558
[29]  
Schiele F, 1997, THROMB HAEMOSTASIS, V77, P834
[30]   Anticoagulation in venous thrombosis [J].
Schulman, S .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 1996, 89 (11) :624-630