The Valuation Impact of SEC Enforcement Actions on Nontarget Foreign Firms

被引:54
作者
Silvers, Roger [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
关键词
SEC; enforcement; bonding; insider trading; restatements; FCPA; SARBANES-OXLEY-ACT; CROSS-LISTINGS; PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT; CORPORATE; COST; LITIGATION; OWNERSHIP; BENEFITS; RETURNS; CHOICES;
D O I
10.1111/1475-679X.12098
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study shows that the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) enforcement intensity toward the foreign firms under its jurisdiction has increased dramatically over the past two decades. Because enforcement events signify an increased threat of future enforcement, I examine the stock returns of foreign firms not targeted by the SEC during windows around enforcement actions that target foreign firms. This design captures the net effects of public enforcement and helps to rule out omitted variables as alternative explanations, because other factors would have to align with enforcement events that do not occur in an obvious pattern (and are therefore unlikely to map onto other news). Nontarget firms experience positive stock returns during the event windows, which is consistent with enforcement constraining the risks of expropriation. The cross-sectional pattern in returns reveals greater returns for firms from weak home legal environments. Finally, consistent with the market adjusting to a new enforcement regime, the magnitude of event returns declines over time. Overall, SEC enforcement is associated with increases in the value of foreign firms, supporting the premise of the legal bonding hypothesis.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 234
页数:48
相关论文
共 70 条
[51]   Measuring securities litigation risk [J].
Kim, Irene ;
Skinner, Douglas J. .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2012, 53 (1-2) :290-310
[52]   Estimation risk, information, and the conditional CAPM: Theory and evidence [J].
Kumar, Praveen ;
Sorescu, Sorin M. ;
Boehme, Rodney D. ;
Danielsen, Bartley R. .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2008, 21 (03) :1037-1075
[53]   What works in securities laws? [J].
La Porta, R ;
Lopez-De-Silanes, F ;
Shleifer, A .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2006, 61 (01) :1-32
[54]   Investor protection and corporate valuation [J].
La Porta, R ;
Lopez-De-Silanes, F ;
Shleifer, A ;
Vishny, R .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2002, 57 (03) :1147-1170
[55]   Law and finance [J].
La Porta, R ;
Lopez-de-Silanes, F ;
Shleifer, A ;
Vishny, RW .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1998, 106 (06) :1113-1155
[56]   Was the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 really this costly? A discussion of evidence from event returns and going-private decisions [J].
Leuz, Christian .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2007, 44 (1-2) :146-165
[57]  
Mann MichaelD., 2005, International Lawyer, V39, P667
[58]   IDENTIFICATION OF ENDOGENOUS SOCIAL EFFECTS - THE REFLECTION PROBLEM [J].
MANSKI, CF .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1993, 60 (03) :531-542
[59]   Investor Sentiment and Stock Market Response to Earnings News [J].
Mian, G. Mujtaba ;
Sankaraguruswamy, Srinivasan .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2012, 87 (04) :1357-1384
[60]   The market reaction to international cross-listings: evidence from Depositary Receipts [J].
Miller, DP .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 51 (01) :103-123