Theories of justice and their implications for priority setting in health care

被引:68
作者
Olsen, JA [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Ctr Hlth Program Evaluat, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0167-6296(97)00010-6
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The paper aims to show how three theories of distributive justice, utilitarianism, egalitarianism and maximin, can provide a clearer understanding of the normative basis of different priority setting regimes in the health service. The paper starts with a brief presentation of the theories, followed by their prescriptions for distribution, as illustrated with their respective preferred points on a utility possibility frontier. After this general discussion, attention is shifted from utils to health. The paper discusses how the recent Norwegian guidelines for priority setting can be understood in the Light of the theories. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:625 / 639
页数:15
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   PRIORITY SETTING IN HEALTH-CARE - AN AXIOMATIC BARGAINING APPROACH [J].
CLARK, D .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1995, 14 (03) :345-360
[2]  
Culyer A, 1990, QUALITY LIFE PERSPEC
[3]   EQUITY AND EQUALITY IN HEALTH AND HEALTH-CARE [J].
CULYER, AJ ;
WAGSTAFF, A .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1993, 12 (04) :431-457
[4]  
CULYER AJ, 1991, 90 CHE U YORK
[5]  
Daniels Norman., 1985, Just Health Care
[6]  
Elster J., 1992, Local justice: How institutions allocate scarce goods and necessary burdens
[7]   LABORATORY RESULTS ON RAWLS DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE [J].
FROHLICH, N ;
OPPENHEIMER, JA ;
EAVEY, CL .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1987, 17 :1-21
[8]   CAN MAXIMIN PRINCIPLE SERVE AS A BASIS FOR MORALITY - CRITIQUE OF RAWLS,J THEORY [J].
HARSANYI, JC .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1975, 69 (02) :594-606
[9]  
HAUSMAN DM, 1993, J ECON LIT, V31, P671
[10]  
Mackie John., 1977, Ethics - inventing right and wrong