PROMIS PF CAT Outperforms the ODI and SF-36 Physical Function Domain in Spine Patients

被引:141
作者
Brodke, Darrel S. [1 ]
Goz, Vadim [1 ]
Voss, Maren W. [1 ]
Lawrence, Brandon D. [1 ]
Spiker, William Ryan [1 ]
Hung, Man [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed, Salt Lake City, UT USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
patient-reported outcomes; PF-CAT; PROMIS; psychometrics; Rasch modeling; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; INFORMATION-SYSTEM PROMIS; REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES; RASCH ANALYSIS; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; MEASUREMENT PRECISION; HEALTH-STATUS; BACK-PAIN; BANK; DISABILITY;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000001965
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
Study Design. The Oswestry Disability Index v2.0 (ODI), SF36 Physical Function Domain (SF-36 PFD), and PROMIS Physical Function CAT v1.2 (PF CAT) questionnaires were prospectively collected from 1607 patients complaining of back or leg pain, visiting a university-based spine clinic. All questionnaires were collected electronically, using a tablet computer. Objective. The aim of this study was to compare the psychometric properties of the PROMIS PF CAT with the ODI and SF36 Physical Function Domain in the same patient population. Summary of Background Data. Evidence-based decision-making is improved by using high-quality patient-reported outcomes measures. Prior studies have revealed the shortcomings of the ODI and SF36, commonly used in spine patients. The PROMIS Network has developed measures with excellent psychometric properties. The Physical Function domain, delivered by Computerized Adaptive Testing (PF CAT), performs well in the spine patient population, though to-date direct comparisons with common measures have not been performed. Methods. Standard Rasch analysis was performed to directly compare the psychometrics of the PF CAT, ODI, and SF36 PFD. Spearman correlations were computed to examine the correlations of the three instruments. Time required for administration was also recorded. Results. One thousand six hundred seven patients were administered all assessments. The time required to answer all items in the PF CAT, ODI, and SF-36 PFD was 44, 169, and 99 seconds. The ceiling and floor effects were excellent for the PF CAT (0.81%, 3.86%), while the ceiling effects were marginal and floor effects quite poor for the ODI (6.91% and 44.24%) and SF36 PFD (5.97% and 23.65%). All instruments significantly correlated with each other. Conclusion. The PROMIS PF CAT outperforms the ODI and SF-36 PFD in the spine patient population and is highly correlated. It has better coverage, while taking less time to administer with fewer questions to answer.
引用
收藏
页码:921 / 929
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]
A comparison of multiple patient reported outcome measures in identifying major depressive disorder in people with multiple sclerosis [J].
Amtmann, Dagmar ;
Bamer, Alyssa M. ;
Johnson, Kurt L. ;
Ehde, Dawn M. ;
Beier, Meghan L. ;
Elzea, Jamie L. ;
Bombardier, Charles H. .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2015, 79 (06) :550-557
[2]
[Anonymous], 2013, APPL RASCH MODEL FUN
[3]
[Anonymous], 2014, Handbook of Item Response Theory Modeling: Applications to Typical Performance Assessment
[4]
[Anonymous], 1960, STUDIES MATH PSYCHOL
[5]
Psychometric evaluation of the PROMIS Physical Function Computerized Adaptive Test in comparison to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and Simple Shoulder Test in patients with rotator cuff disease [J].
Beckmann, James T. ;
Hung, Man ;
Bounsanga, Jerry ;
Wylie, James D. ;
Granger, Erin K. ;
Tashjian, Robert Z. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2015, 24 (12) :1961-1967
[6]
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years [J].
Cella, David ;
Yount, Susan ;
Rothrock, Nan ;
Gershon, Richard ;
Cook, Karon ;
Reeve, Bryce ;
Ader, Deborah ;
Fries, James F. ;
Bruce, Bonnie ;
Rose, Mattias .
MEDICAL CARE, 2007, 45 (05) :S3-S11
[7]
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008 [J].
Cella, David ;
Riley, William ;
Stone, Arthur ;
Rothrock, Nan ;
Reeve, Bryce ;
Yount, Susan ;
Amtmann, Dagmar ;
Bode, Rita ;
Buysse, Daniel ;
Choi, Seung ;
Cook, Karon ;
DeVellis, Robert ;
DeWalt, Darren ;
Fries, James F. ;
Gershon, Richard ;
Hahn, Elizabeth A. ;
Lai, Jin-Shei ;
Pilkonis, Paul ;
Revicki, Dennis ;
Rose, Matthias ;
Weinfurt, Kevin ;
Hays, Ron .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 63 (11) :1179-1194
[8]
Evaluating Common Outcomes for Measuring Treatment Success for Chronic Low Back Pain [J].
Chapman, Jens R. ;
Norvell, Daniel C. ;
Hermsmeyer, Jeffrey T. ;
Bransford, Richard J. ;
DeVine, John ;
McGirt, Matthew J. ;
Lee, Michael J. .
SPINE, 2011, 36 (21) :S54-S68
[10]
Utility of the Oswestry Disability Index for studies of back pain related disability in nurses: Evaluation of psychometric and measurement properties [J].
Dawson, Anna P. ;
Steele, Emily J. ;
Hodges, Paul W. ;
Stewart, Simon .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2010, 47 (05) :604-607