An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research

被引:191
作者
Errington, Timothy M. [1 ]
Iorns, Elizabeth [2 ]
Gunn, William [3 ]
Tan, Fraser Elisabeth [2 ]
Lomax, Joelle [2 ]
Nosek, Brian A. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Open Sci, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
[2] Sci Exchange, Palo Alto, CA USA
[3] Mendeley, London, England
[4] Univ Virginia, Charlottesville, VA USA
来源
ELIFE | 2014年 / 3卷
关键词
PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH; REPLICATION; SCIENCE; AVAILABILITY; CONSEQUENCES; NEUROSCIENCE; PUBLICATION; PREVENTION; FALSE; AGAIN;
D O I
10.7554/eLife.04333
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
It is widely believed that research that builds upon previously published findings has reproduced the original work. However, it is rare for researchers to perform or publish direct replications of existing results. The Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology is an open investigation of reproducibility in preclinical cancer biology research. We have identified 50 high impact cancer biology articles published in the period 2010-2012, and plan to replicate a subset of experimental results from each article. A Registered Report detailing the proposed experimental designs and protocols for each subset of experiments will be peer reviewed and published prior to data collection. The results of these experiments will then be published in a Replication Study. The resulting open methodology and dataset will provide evidence about the reproducibility of high-impact results, and an opportunity to identify predictors of reproducibility.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [21] Statistical Design Considerations in Animal Studies Published Recently in Cancer Research
    Hess, Kenneth R.
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 71 (02) : 625 - 625
  • [22] Sorting Out the FACS: A Devil in the Details
    Hines, William C.
    Su, Ying
    Kuhn, Irene
    Polyak, Kornelia
    Bissell, Mina J.
    [J]. CELL REPORTS, 2014, 6 (05): : 779 - 781
  • [23] Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    Munafo, Marcus R.
    Fusar-Poli, Paolo
    Nosek, Brian A.
    David, Sean P.
    [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2014, 18 (05) : 235 - 241
  • [24] Improving Validation Practices in "Omics" Research
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    Khoury, Muin J.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2011, 334 (6060) : 1230 - 1232
  • [25] Why most published research findings are false
    Ioannidis, JPA
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2005, 2 (08) : 696 - 701
  • [26] Again, and Again, and Again ... INTRODUCTION
    Jasny, Barbara R.
    Chin, Gilbert
    Chong, Lisa
    Vignieri, Sacha
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2011, 334 (6060) : 1225 - 1225
  • [27] Kuhn T. S., 1962, STRUCTURE SCI REVOLU
  • [28] A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research
    Landis, Story C.
    Amara, Susan G.
    Asadullah, Khusru
    Austin, Chris P.
    Blumenstein, Robi
    Bradley, Eileen W.
    Crystal, Ronald G.
    Darnell, Robert B.
    Ferrante, Robert J.
    Fillit, Howard
    Finkelstein, Robert
    Fisher, Marc
    Gendelman, Howard E.
    Golub, Robert M.
    Goudreau, John L.
    Gross, Robert A.
    Gubitz, Amelie K.
    Hesterlee, Sharon E.
    Howells, David W.
    Huguenard, John
    Kelner, Katrina
    Koroshetz, Walter
    Krainc, Dimitri
    Lazic, Stanley E.
    Levine, Michael S.
    Macleod, Malcolm R.
    McCall, John M.
    Moxley, Richard T., III
    Narasimhan, Kalyani
    Noble, Linda J.
    Perrin, Steve
    Porter, John D.
    Steward, Oswald
    Unger, Ellis
    Utz, Ursula
    Silberberg, Shai D.
    [J]. NATURE, 2012, 490 (7419) : 187 - 191
  • [29] Irreproducible Experimental Results Causes, (Mis)interpretations, and Consequences
    Loscalzo, Joseph
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2012, 125 (10) : 1211 - 1214
  • [30] Replications in Psychology Research: How Often Do They Really Occur?
    Makel, Matthew C.
    Plucker, Jonathan A.
    Hegarty, Boyd
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 7 (06) : 537 - 542