MR and CT image fusion for postimplant analysis in permanent prostate seed implants

被引:77
作者
Polo, A
Cattani, F
Vavassori, A
Origgi, D
Villa, G
Marsiglia, H
Bellomi, M
Tosi, G
De Cobelli, O
Orecchia, R
机构
[1] Inst Catalan Oncol, Div Radiat Oncol, Barcelona 08097, Spain
[2] European Inst Oncol, Div Radiat Oncol, Milan, Italy
[3] European Inst Oncol, Div Radiol, Milan, Italy
[4] European Inst Oncol, Div Urol, Milan, Italy
[5] European Inst Oncol, Dept Med Phys, Milan, Italy
[6] Univ Milan, Inst Radiol, Milan, Italy
[7] Univ Milan, Fac Med, Milan, Italy
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2004年 / 60卷 / 05期
关键词
CT-MRI image fusion; implant evaluation; permanent implant; prostate; brachytherapy;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.08.033
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the outcome of two different image-based postimplant dosimetry methods in permanent seed implantation. Methods and Materials: Between October 1999 and October 2002, 150 patients with low-risk prostate carcinoma were treated with I-125 and Pd-103 in our institution. A CT-MRI image fusion protocol was used in 21 consecutive patients treated with exclusive brachytherapy. The accuracy and reproducibility of the method was calculated, and then the CT-based dosimetry was compared with the CT-MRI-based dosimetry using the dose-volume histogram (DVH) related parameters recommended by the American Brachytherapy Society and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Results: Our method for CT-MRI image fusion was accurate and reproducible (median shift <1 mm). Differences in prostate volume were found, depending on the image modality used. Quality assurance DVH-related parameters strongly depended on the image modality (CT vs. CT-MRI): V-100 = 82% vs. 88%, p < 0.05. D-90 = 96% vs. 115%, p < 0.05. Those results depend on the institutional implant technique and reflect the importance of lowering inter- and intraobserver discrepancies when outlining prostate and organs at risk for postimplant dosimetry. Conclusions: Computed tomography-MRI fused images allow accurate determination of prostate size, significantly improving the dosimetric evaluation based on DVH analysis. This provides a consistent method to judge a prostate seed implant's quality. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1572 / 1579
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
[31]   Prostate volumes defined by magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomographic scans for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy [J].
Roach, M ;
FaillaceAkazawa, P ;
Malfatti, C ;
Holland, J ;
Hricak, H .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1996, 35 (05) :1011-1018
[32]   THE EFFECT OF GEOMETRIC ERRORS IN THE RECONSTRUCTION OF IR-192 SEED IMPLANTS [J].
ROSEN, II ;
KHAN, KM ;
LANE, RG ;
KELSEY, CA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1982, 9 (02) :220-223
[33]   LOCALIZATION OF THE PROSTATIC APEX FOR RADIATION-THERAPY USING IMPLANTED MARKERS [J].
SANDLER, HM ;
BREE, RL ;
MCLAUGHLIN, PW ;
GROSSMAN, HB ;
LICHTER, AS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1993, 27 (04) :915-919
[34]   Determinations of prostate volume at 3-tesla using an external phased array coil: Comparison to pathologic specimens [J].
Sosna, J ;
Rofsky, NM ;
Gaston, SM ;
DeWolf, WC ;
Lenkinski, RE .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2003, 10 (08) :846-853
[35]   A dose-response study for I-125 prostate implants [J].
Stock, RG ;
Stone, NN ;
Tabert, A ;
Iannuzzi, C ;
DeWyngaert, JK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 41 (01) :101-108
[36]   DETERMINATION OF PROSTATE VOLUME BY TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND [J].
TERRIS, MK ;
STAMEY, TA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 145 (05) :984-987
[37]   ESTIMATION OF PROSTATE-CANCER VOLUME BY TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND IMAGING [J].
TERRIS, MK ;
MCNEAL, JE ;
STAMEY, TA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 147 (03) :855-857
[38]  
Tewari A, 1996, J CLIN ULTRASOUND, V24, P169, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0096(199605)24:4<169::AID-JCU2>3.3.CO
[39]  
2-8
[40]   Variation of clinical target volume definition in three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer [J].
Valicenti, RK ;
Sweet, JW ;
Hauck, WW ;
Hudes, RS ;
Lee, T ;
Dicker, AP ;
Waterman, FM ;
Anne, PR ;
Corn, BW ;
Galvin, JM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 44 (04) :931-935