Improved estimation of ligand-macromolecule binding affinities by linear response approach using a combination of multi-mode MD simulation and QM/MM methods

被引:17
作者
Khandelwal, Akash [1 ]
Balaz, Stefan [1 ]
机构
[1] N Dakota State Univ, Dept Pharmaceut Sci, Coll Pharm, Fargo, ND 58105 USA
关键词
affinity; binding energy; enzyme inhibition; ligand-macromolecule binding; matrix metalloproteinases; metalloproteins; linear response approach; molecular dynamics; prediction; QM; MM;
D O I
10.1007/s10822-007-9104-4
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Structure-based predictions of binding affinities of ligands binding to proteins by coordination bonds with transition metals, covalent bonds, and bonds involving charge re-distributions are hindered by the absence of proper force fields. This shortcoming affects all methods which use force-field-based molecular simulation data on complex formation for affinity predictions. One of the most frequently used methods in this category is the Linear Response (LR) approach of Aquist, correlating binding affinities with van der Waals and electrostatic energies, as extended by Jorgensen's inclusion of solvent-accessible surface areas. All these terms represent the differences, upon binding, in the ensemble averages of pertinent quantities, obtained from molecular dynamics (MD) or Monte Carlo simulations of the complex and of single components. Here we report a modification of the LR approach by: (1) the replacement of the two energy terms through the single-point QM/MM energy of the time-averaged complex structure from an MD simulation; and (2) a rigorous consideration of multiple modes (mm) of binding. The first extension alleviates the force-field related problems, while the second extension deals with the ligands exhibiting large-scale motions in the course of an MD simulation. The second modification results in the correlation equation that is nonlinear in optimized coefficients, but does not lead to an increase in the number of optimized coefficients. The application of the resulting mm QM/MM LR approach to the inhibition of zinc-dependent gelatinase B (matrix metalloproteinase 9) by 28 hydroxamate ligands indicates a significant improvement of descriptive and predictive abilities.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 137
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[11]   How does the Gibbs free energy evolve in a system undergoing coupled competitive reactions? [J].
Jullien, L ;
Proust, A ;
Le Menn, JC .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 1998, 75 (02) :194-199
[12]   A combination of docking, QM/MM methods, and MD simulation for binding affinity estimation of metalloprotein ligands [J].
Khandelwal, A ;
Lukacova, V ;
Comez, D ;
Kroll, DM ;
Raha, S ;
Balaz, S .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2005, 48 (17) :5437-5447
[13]   Processing multimode binding situations in simulation-based prediction of ligand-macromolecule affinities [J].
Khandelwal, A ;
Lukacova, V ;
Kroll, DM ;
Raha, S ;
Comez, D ;
Balaz, S .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A, 2005, 109 (29) :6387-6391
[14]   Simulation-based predictions of binding affinities of matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors [J].
Khandelwal, A ;
Lukacova, V ;
Kroll, DM ;
Çömez, D ;
Raha, S ;
Balaz, S .
QSAR & COMBINATORIAL SCIENCE, 2004, 23 (09) :754-766
[15]   FREE-ENERGY CALCULATIONS - APPLICATIONS TO CHEMICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL PHENOMENA [J].
KOLLMAN, P .
CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 1993, 93 (07) :2395-2417
[16]   Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: Combining molecular mechanics and continuum models [J].
Kollman, PA ;
Massova, I ;
Reyes, C ;
Kuhn, B ;
Huo, SH ;
Chong, L ;
Lee, M ;
Lee, T ;
Duan, Y ;
Wang, W ;
Donini, O ;
Cieplak, P ;
Srinivasan, J ;
Case, DA ;
Cheatham, TE .
ACCOUNTS OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH, 2000, 33 (12) :889-897
[17]   Binding of a diverse set of ligands to avidin and streptavidin: An accurate quantitative prediction of their relative affinities by a combination of molecular mechanics and continuum solvent models [J].
Kuhn, B ;
Kollman, PA .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2000, 43 (20) :3786-3791
[18]   Validation and use of the MM-PBSA approach for drug discovery [J].
Kuhn, B ;
Gerber, P ;
Schulz-Gasch, T ;
Stahl, M .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2005, 48 (12) :4040-4048
[19]   Prediction of protein-ligand interactions. Docking and scoring: Successes and gaps [J].
Leach, Andrew R. ;
Shoichet, Brian K. ;
Peishoff, Catherine E. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2006, 49 (20) :5851-5855
[20]   Small Molecule Docking and Scoring [J].
Muegge, Ingo ;
Rarey, Matthias .
REVIEWS IN COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, VOL 17, 2001, 17 :1-60