Trouble in the Tails? What We Know about Earnings Nonresponse 30 Years after Lillard, Smith, and Welch

被引:88
作者
Bollinger, Christopher R. [1 ]
Hirsch, Barry T. [2 ,3 ]
Hokayem, Charles M. [4 ]
Ziliak, James P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
[2] Georgia State Univ, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[3] Inst Labor Econ IZA, Bonn, Germany
[4] United States Census Bur, Hillcrest Hts, MD USA
关键词
CURRENT POPULATION SURVEY; SAMPLE SELECTION BIAS; ROTATION GROUP BIAS; GENDER WAGE GAP; MEASUREMENT ERROR; UNITED-STATES; RESPONSE ERROR; MATCH BIAS; TRENDS; INEQUALITY;
D O I
10.1086/701807
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Earnings nonresponse in household surveys is widespread, yet there is limited knowledge of how nonresponse biases earnings measures. We examine the consequences of nonresponse on earnings gaps and inequality using Current Population Survey individual records linked to administrative earnings data. The common assumption that earnings are missing at random is rejected. Nonresponse across the earnings distribution is U-shaped, highest in the left and right tails. Inequality measures differ between household and administrative data due in part to nonresponse. Nonresponse biases earnings differentials by race, gender, and education, particularly in the tails. Flexible copula-based models can account for nonrandom nonresponse.
引用
收藏
页码:2143 / 2185
页数:43
相关论文
共 57 条
[41]   DOES IT MATTER WHO RESPONDED TO THE SURVEY? TRENDS IN THE US GENDER EARNINGS GAP REVISITED [J].
Lee, Jungmin ;
Lee, Sokbae .
ILR REVIEW, 2012, 65 (01) :148-160
[42]   Increasing residual wage inequality: Composition effects, noisy data, or rising demand for skill? [J].
Lemieux, T .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2006, 96 (03) :461-498
[43]   WHAT DO WE REALLY KNOW ABOUT WAGES - THE IMPORTANCE OF NONREPORTING AND CENSUS IMPUTATION [J].
LILLARD, L ;
SMITH, JP ;
WELCH, F .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1986, 94 (03) :489-506
[44]  
Little R. J., 2019, STAT ANAL MISSING DA, V793
[45]   Counterfactual decomposition of changes in wage distributions using quantile regression [J].
Machado, JAF ;
Mata, J .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2005, 20 (04) :445-465
[46]  
Marquis KentH., 1990, Proceedings of the 1990 Annual Research Conference, P721
[47]   OUT OF WORK, OUT OF MIND - RESPONSE ERRORS IN RETROSPECTIVE REPORTS OF UNEMPLOYMENT [J].
MATHIOWETZ, NA ;
DUNCAN, GJ .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 1988, 6 (02) :221-229
[48]   ACCURACY OF RESPONSE IN LABOR-MARKET SURVEYS - EVIDENCE AND IMPLICATIONS [J].
MELLOW, W ;
SIDER, H .
JOURNAL OF LABOR ECONOMICS, 1983, 1 (04) :331-344
[49]  
Nicholas Joyce, 2009, Soc Secur Bull, V69, P45
[50]   HOW REPRESENTATIVE ARE MATCHED CROSS-SECTIONS - EVIDENCE FROM THE CURRENT POPULATION SURVEY [J].
PERACCHI, F ;
WELCH, F .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1995, 68 (01) :153-179