Linkages between citizens and politicians in democratic polities

被引:493
作者
Kitschelt, H [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Durham, NC 27706 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/001041400003300607
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Research on democratic party competition in the formal spatial tradition of Downs and the comparative-historical tradition of Lipset and Rokkan assumes that linkages of accountability and responsiveness between voters and political elites work through politicians' programmatic appeals and policy achievements. This ignores, however, alternative voter-elite linkages through the personal charisma of political leaders and, more important, selective material incentives in networks of direct exchange (clientelism). In light of the diversity of linkage mechanisms appearing in new democracies and changing linkages in established democracies, this article explores theories of linkage choice. It first develops conceptual definitions of charismatic, clientelist, and programmatic linkages between politicians and electoral constituencies. It then asks whether politicians face a trade-off or mutual reinforcement in employing linkage mechanisms. The core section of the article details developmentalist, statist, institutional, political-economic, and cultural-ideological theories of citizen-elite linkage formation in democracies, showing that none of the theories is fully encompassing. The final section considers empirical measurement problems in comparative research on linkage.
引用
收藏
页码:845 / 879
页数:35
相关论文
共 109 条
[1]   The new economics of corruption: a survey and some new results [J].
Ades, A ;
DiTella, R .
POLITICAL STUDIES, 1997, 45 (03) :496-515
[2]  
Aldrich JohnH., 1995, WHY PARTIES
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1981, POLITICAL CLIENTELIS
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1999, CORRUPTION GOVT
[7]  
[Anonymous], J DEMOCRACY
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Sultanistic Regimes
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1996, COMP DEMOCRACIES ELE
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1989, AUSTRIAN PARTY SYSTE