An overview of pedometric techniques for use in soil survey

被引:388
作者
McBratney, AB [1 ]
Odeh, IOA [1 ]
Bishop, TFA [1 ]
Dunbar, MS [1 ]
Shatar, TM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Dept Agr Chem & Soil Sci, Australian Cotton CRC, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
soil science; soil survey; pedometrics; soil geostatistics; spatial prediction; generalised additive models; regression trees;
D O I
10.1016/S0016-7061(00)00043-4
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Quantitative techniques for spatial prediction in soil survey are developing apace. They generally derive from geostatistics and modern statistics. The recent developments in geostatistics are reviewed particularly with respect to non-linear methods and the use of all types of ancillary information. Additionally analysis based on non-stationarity of a variable and the use of ancillary information are demonstrated as encompassing modern regression techniques, including generalised linear models (GLM), generalised additive models (GAM), classification and regression trees (RT) and neural networks (NN). Three resolutions of interest are discussed. Case studies are used to illustrate different pedometric techniques, and a variety of ancillary data. The case studies focus on predicting different soil properties and classifying soil in an area into soil classes defined a priori. Different techniques produced different error of interpolation. Hybrid methods such as CLORPT with geostatistics offer powerful spatial prediction methods, especially up to the catchment and regional extent. It is shown that the use of each pedometric technique depends on the purpose of the survey and the accuracy required of the final product. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 327
页数:35
相关论文
共 83 条
[11]  
Bezdek J. C., 1981, Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms
[12]   Exploring land quality effects on world food supply [J].
Bouma, J ;
Batjes, NH ;
Groot, JJR .
GEODERMA, 1998, 86 (1-2) :43-59
[13]  
Bourgault G, 1997, ADV AGRON, V58, P241
[14]   OPTIMAL INTERPOLATION AND ISARITHMIC MAPPING OF SOIL PROPERTIES .1. THE SEMI-VARIOGRAM AND PUNCTUAL KRIGING [J].
BURGESS, TM ;
WEBSTER, R .
JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1980, 31 (02) :315-331
[15]  
Burrough P. A., 1986, PRINCIPLES GEOGRAPHI
[16]   FUZZY CLASSIFICATION METHODS FOR DETERMINING LAND SUITABILITY FROM SOIL-PROFILE OBSERVATIONS AND TOPOGRAPHY [J].
BURROUGH, PA ;
MACMILLAN, RA ;
VANDEURSEN, W .
JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1992, 43 (02) :193-210
[17]   FUZZY MATHEMATICAL-METHODS FOR SOIL SURVEY AND LAND EVALUATION [J].
BURROUGH, PA .
JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1989, 40 (03) :477-492
[18]  
Chang L., 1987, Soil Survey and Land Evaluation, V7, P69
[19]   Use of airborne gamma radiometric data for soil mapping [J].
Cook, SE ;
Corner, RJ ;
Groves, PR ;
Grealish, GJ .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 1996, 34 (01) :183-194
[20]   ESTABLISHING SOIL ELECTRICAL-CONDUCTIVITY - DEPTH RELATIONS FROM ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTION MEASUREMENTS [J].
CORWIN, DL ;
RHOADES, JD .
COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 1990, 21 (11-12) :861-901