Considering rational self-interest as a disposition: Organizational implications of other orientation

被引:258
作者
Meglino, BM [1 ]
Korsgaard, MA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Carolina, Moore Sch Business, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.946
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In contrast with major theories of attitudes. and behavior, the authors propose that individuals are not equally motivated to pursue their self-interests. The authors show that differences in other orientation affect the extent to which actions and attitudes reflect self-interested calculation (instrumental rationality) and the extent to which beliefs represent their external environment (epistemic rationality). These differences have consequences for processes underlying a wide range of attitudes and behavior typically assumed to be rationally self-interested. Thus, the authors' model exposes a common explanation for diverse organizational phenomena. It also clarifies inconsistencies surrounding the validity of certain attitudinal and motivational models, the relationship between job attitudes and actions, cross-cultural differences in attitudes and behavior; escalation of commitment, and the relationship between chief executive officer characteristics and organizational performance.
引用
收藏
页码:946 / 959
页数:14
相关论文
共 129 条
[1]   WAGE INEQUITIES, PRODUCTIVITY AND WORK QUALITY [J].
ADAMS, JS .
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, 1963, 3 (01) :9-16
[2]   Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values [J].
Agle, BR ;
Mitchell, RK ;
Sonnenfeld, JA .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1999, 42 (05) :507-525
[3]   Nature and operation of attitudes [J].
Ajzen, I .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 52 :27-58
[4]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[5]  
[Anonymous], ORG PATTERNS MANAGER
[6]  
ARCHER RL, 1991, PSYCHOL INQ, V2, P123
[7]  
ARGENTI J, 1976, CORPORATE COLLAPSE
[8]   Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review [J].
Armitage, CJ ;
Conner, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 40 :471-499
[9]  
Atwater LE, 1997, RES PERS H, V15, P121
[10]  
AUPPERLE KE, 1985, ACAD MANAGE J, V28, P446, DOI 10.5465/256210