Processed meat and colorectal cancer: a quantitative review of prospective epidemiologic studies

被引:58
作者
Alexander, Dominik D. [1 ]
Miller, Arthur J. [2 ]
Cushing, Colleen A. [1 ]
Lowe, Kimberly A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Exponent Inc, Hlth Sci, Wood Dale, IL USA
[2] Exponent Inc, Hlth Sci, Bowie, MD USA
[3] Exponent Inc, Hlth Sci, Bellevue, WA USA
关键词
colorectal cancer; diet; epidemiology; meta-analysis; nutrition; MAJOR DIETARY PATTERNS; N-NITROSO COMPOUNDS; COLON-CANCER; RISK-FACTORS; PROSPECTIVE COHORT; FAMILY-HISTORY; RECTAL-CANCER; CONSUMPTION; FAT; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32833b48fa
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
A tremendous amount of scientific interest has been generated regarding processed meat consumption and cancer risk. Therefore, to estimate the association between processed meat intake and colorectal cancer (CRC), a meta-analysis of prospective studies was conducted. Twenty-eight prospective studies of processed meat and CRC were identified, of which 20 represented independent nonoverlapping study populations. Summary relative risk estimates (SRREs) for high versus low intake and dose-response relationships were calculated. The SRRE for high (vs. low) processed meat intake and CRC was 1.16 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10-1.23] for all studies. Summary associations were modified considerably by sex; the SRRE for men was 1.23 (95% CI: 1.07-1.42) and the SRRE for women was 1.05 (95% CI: 0.94-1.16), based on nine and 13 studies, respectively. Sensitivity analyses did not indicate appreciable statistical variation by tumor site, processed meat groups, or study location. The SRRE for each 30-gram increment of processed meat and CRC was 1.10 (95% CI: 1.05-1.15) based on nine studies, and the SRRE for each incremental serving of processed meat per week was 1.03 (95% CI: 1.01-1.05) based on six studies. Overall, summary associations were weak in magnitude (i.e. most less than 1.20), processed meat definitions and analytical comparisons were highly variable across studies, and isolating the independent effects of processed meat intake is difficult, given the likely influence of confounding by other dietary and lifestyle factors. Therefore, the currently available epidemiologic evidence is not sufficient to support a clear and unequivocal independent positive association between processed meat consumption and CRC. European Journal of Cancer Prevention 19: 328-341 (C) 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 341
页数:14
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Meta-analysis of animal fat or animal protein intake and colorectal cancer [J].
Alexander, Dominik D. ;
Cushing, Colleen A. ;
Lowe, Kimberly A. ;
Sceurman, Bonnie ;
Roberts, Mark A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2009, 89 (05) :1402-1409
[2]  
[Anonymous], POL ACT CANC PREV FO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Comprehensive Meta-Analysis
[4]  
ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry), 1995, TOX PROF POL AR HYDR
[5]   Heme and chlorophyll intake and risk of colorectal cancer in the Netherlands Cohort Study [J].
Balder, HF ;
de Vogel, J ;
Jansen, MCJF ;
Weijenberg, MP ;
van den Brandt, PA ;
Westenbrink, S ;
van der Meer, R ;
Goldbohm, RA .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2006, 15 (04) :717-725
[6]   METAANALYSIS OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC DOSE-RESPONSE DATA [J].
BERLIN, JA ;
LONGNECKER, MP ;
GREENLAND, S .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1993, 4 (03) :218-228
[7]   False-positive results in cancer epidemiology: A plea for epistemological modesty [J].
Boffetta, Paolo ;
McLaughlin, Joseph K. ;
La Vecchia, Carlo ;
Tarone, Robert E. ;
Lipworth, Loren ;
Blot, William J. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2008, 100 (14) :988-995
[8]  
BORCHERT LL, 2004, POULTRY MEAT QUALITY
[9]   SUGAR, MEAT, AND FAT INTAKE, AND NONDIETARY RISK-FACTORS FOR COLON-CANCER INCIDENCE IN IOWA WOMEN (UNITED-STATES) [J].
BOSTICK, RM ;
POTTER, JD ;
KUSHI, LH ;
SELLERS, TA ;
STEINMETZ, KA ;
MCKENZIE, DR ;
GAPSTUR, SM ;
FOLSOM, AR .
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 1994, 5 (01) :38-52
[10]   Meat consumption and K-ras mutations in sporadic colon and rectal cancer in The Netherlands Cohort Study [J].
Brink, M ;
Weijenberg, MP ;
de Goeij, AFPM ;
Roemen, GMJM ;
Lentjes, MHFM ;
de Bruïne, AP ;
Goldbohm, RA ;
van den Brandt, PA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 92 (07) :1310-1320