Effects of stop-signal probability in the stop-signal paradigm: The N2/P3 complex further validated

被引:193
作者
Ramautar, JR
Kok, A
Ridderinkhof, KR
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Psychol, NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Dept Psychol, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.bandc.2004.07.002
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to examine the effects of frequency of occurrence of stop signals in the stop-signal paradigm. Presenting stop signals less frequently resulted in faster reaction times to the go stimulus and a lower probability of inhibition. Also, go stimuli elicited larger and somewhat earlier P3 responses when stop signals occurred less frequently. Since the amplitude effect was more pronounced on trials when go signals were followed by fast than slow reactions, it probably reflected a stronger set to produce fast responses. N2 and P3 components to stop signals were observed to be larger and of longer latency when stop signals occurred less frequently. The amplitude enhancement of these N2 and P3 components were more pronounced for unsuccessful than for successful stop-signal trials. Moreover, the successfully inhibited stop trials elicited a frontocentral P3 whereas unsuccessfully inhibited stop trials elicited a more posterior P3 that resembled the classical P3b. P3 amplitude in the unsuccessfully inhibited condition also differed between waveforms synchronized with the stop signal and waveforms synchronized with response onset whereas N2 amplitude did not. Taken together these findings suggest that N2 reflected a greater significance of failed inhibitions after low probability stop signals while P3 reflected continued processing of the erroneous response after response execution. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 252
页数:19
相关论文
共 60 条
[41]   LOCUS OF STIMULUS PROBABILITY EFFECT [J].
MILLER, JO ;
PACHELLA, RG .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1973, 101 (02) :227-231
[42]   Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: Evidence for a "generic" neural system for error detection [J].
Miltner, WHR ;
Braun, CH ;
Coles, MGH .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1997, 9 (06) :788-798
[43]  
Nieuwenhuis S, 2001, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, V38, P752, DOI 10.1017/S0048577201001111
[44]  
NIEUWENHUIS S, 2003, COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE, V3
[45]   Inhibition in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A psychophysiological study of the stop task [J].
Overtoom, CCE ;
Kenemans, JL ;
Verbaten, MN ;
Kemmer, C ;
van der Molen, MW ;
van Engeland, H ;
Buitelaar, JK ;
Koelega, HS .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 51 (08) :668-676
[46]   ERPS TO STIMULI REQUIRING RESPONSE PRODUCTION AND INHIBITION - EFFECTS OF AGE, PROBABILITY AND VISUAL NOISE [J].
PFEFFERBAUM, A ;
FORD, JM .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1988, 71 (01) :55-63
[47]   ERPS TO RESPONSE PRODUCTION AND INHIBITION [J].
PFEFFERBAUM, A ;
FORD, JM ;
WELLER, BJ ;
KOPELL, BS .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1985, 60 (05) :423-434
[48]   Inhibitory control in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Event-related potentials identify the processing component and timing of an impaired right-frontal response-inhibition mechanism [J].
Pliszka, SR ;
Liotti, M ;
Woldorff, MG .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 48 (03) :238-246
[49]  
RAMAUTAR JR, 2004, ERRORS CONFLICTS BRA
[50]  
RAMAUTAR JR, IN PRESS MODALITY EF