Grounding object concepts in perception and action: Evidence from fMRI studies of tools

被引:121
作者
Beauchamp, Michael S. [1 ]
Martin, Alex [1 ]
机构
[1] NIMH, IRP, Sect Cognit Neuropsychol, Lab Brain & Cognit, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
manipulable objects; human visual cortex; conceptual representation; middle temporal gyrus; functional; magnetic resonance imaging;
D O I
10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70470-2
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Studies of categories of objects, including tools, have spurred the development of the sensory-motor model of object concept representation. According to this model, information about objects is represented in the same neural subsystems that are active when we perceive and use them. In turn, this model has provided insight into the brain mechanisms of tool use. For tools, three types of information are especially important for identification: the characteristic motion with which they move (such as the up and down motion of a hammer), their visual form, and the way that they are manipulated. Evidence from neuropsychological, non-human primates, and neuroimaging studies suggest a mapping between specific brain regions and these fundamental identifying properties of tools. We focus on neuroimaging studies of the left posterior middle temporal gyrus. This brain region is active both when subjects perceive moving tools and when they answer questions about tools, and is responsive to the type of visual motion characteristic of tools: rigid, unarticulated motion. We describe a simple model that explains how low-level receptive field properties like those known to exist in area MT/V5 could give rise to the high-level category-related representations observed in functional imaging experiments.
引用
收藏
页码:461 / 468
页数:8
相关论文
共 66 条
[31]   Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized [J].
Handy, TC ;
Grafton, ST ;
Shroff, NM ;
Ketay, S ;
Gazzaniga, MS .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 6 (04) :421-427
[32]   Extending or projecting peripersonal space with tools? Multisensory interactions highlight only the distal and proximal ends of tools [J].
Holmes, NP ;
Calvert, GA ;
Spence, C .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2004, 372 (1-2) :62-67
[33]   ON TELLING YOUR FRUIT FROM YOUR VEGETABLES - A CONSIDERATION OF CATEGORY-SPECIFIC DEFICITS AFTER BRAIN-DAMAGE [J].
HUMPHREYS, GW ;
RIDDOCH, MJ .
TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 1987, 10 (04) :145-148
[34]   GRASPING OBJECTS - THE CORTICAL MECHANISMS OF VISUOMOTOR TRANSFORMATION [J].
JEANNEROD, M ;
ARBIB, MA ;
RIZZOLATTI, G ;
SAKATA, H .
TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 1995, 18 (07) :314-320
[35]   Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition [J].
Jeannerod, M .
NEUROIMAGE, 2001, 14 (01) :S103-S109
[36]   STUDIES ON VISUAL-PERCEPTION OF LOCOMOTION [J].
JOHANSSON, G .
PERCEPTION, 1977, 6 (04) :365-376
[37]   The neural bases of complex tool use in humans [J].
Johnson-Frey, SH .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2004, 8 (02) :71-78
[38]   What's so special about human tool use? [J].
Johnson-Frey, SH .
NEURON, 2003, 39 (02) :201-204
[39]  
JOHNSONFREY SH, 2004, CEREBRAL CORTEX
[40]   Actions speak louder than functions: The importance of manipulability and action in tool representation [J].
Kellenbach, ML ;
Brett, M ;
Patterson, K .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 15 (01) :30-46