Species identification and quantification in meat and meat products using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR)

被引:139
作者
Floren, C. [1 ]
Wiedemann, I. [1 ]
Brenig, B. [1 ]
Schuetz, E. [1 ,2 ]
Beck, J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gottingen, Inst Vet Med, D-37077 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Chronix Biomed GmbH, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany
关键词
Species determination; Nuclear DNA; Quantification; Meat products; Droplet digital PCR; POLYMERASE-CHAIN-REACTION; DNA COPY NUMBER; REAL-TIME PCR; MITOCHONDRIAL; ADULTERATION; ASSAY; PORK; FOODS; BEEF; RAW;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.10.138
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
Species fraud and product mislabelling in processed food, albeit not being a direct health issue, often results in consumer distrust. Therefore methods for quantification of undeclared species are needed. Targeting mitochondrial DNA, e.g. CYTB gene, for species quantification is unsuitable, due to a fivefold inter-tissue variation in mtDNA content per cell resulting in either an under- (-70%) or overestimation (+160%) of species DNA contents. Here, we describe a reliable two-step droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay targeting the nuclear F2 gene for precise quantification of cattle, horse, and pig in processed meat products. The ddPCR assay is advantageous over qPCR showing a limit of quantification (LOQ) and detection (LOD) in different meat products of 0.01% and 0.001%, respectively. The specificity was verified in 14 different species. Hence, determining F2 in food by ddPCR can be recommended for quality assurance and control in production systems. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1054 / 1058
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Detection of species in meat and meat products using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
    Ayaz, Y
    Ayaz, ND
    Erol, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MUSCLE FOODS, 2006, 17 (02) : 214 - 220
  • [2] Digital PCR hits its stride
    Baker, Monya
    [J]. NATURE METHODS, 2012, 9 (06) : 541 - 544
  • [3] Species determination - Can we detect and quantify meat adulteration?
    Ballin, Nicolai Z.
    Vogensen, Finn K.
    Karlsson, Anders H.
    [J]. MEAT SCIENCE, 2009, 83 (02) : 165 - 174
  • [4] Codex Committee on Methods of Analysis and Sampling, 2010, 7402010 CACGL COD CO
  • [5] The Causes and Consequences of Polyploidy in Normal Development and Cancer
    Davoli, Teresa
    de Lange, Titia
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF CELL AND DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, VOL 27, 2011, 27 : 585 - 610
  • [6] Mathematical Analysis of Copy Number Variation in a DNA Sample Using Digital PCR on a Nanofluidic Device
    Dube, Simant
    Qin, Jian
    Ramakrishnan, Ramesh
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2008, 3 (08):
  • [7] European Commission, 2002, OFFICIAL J EUROPEA L, V305
  • [8] Real-time PCR: what relevance to plant studies?
    Gachon, C
    Mingam, A
    Charrier, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2004, 55 (402) : 1445 - 1454
  • [9] Myoglobin as marker in meat adulteration: A UPLC method for determining the presence of pork meat in raw beef burger
    Giaretta, Nicola
    Di Giuseppe, Antonella M. A.
    Lippert, Martina
    Parente, Augusto
    Di Maro, Antimo
    [J]. FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2013, 141 (03) : 1814 - 1820
  • [10] Real time quantitative PCR
    Heid, CA
    Stevens, J
    Livak, KJ
    Williams, PM
    [J]. GENOME RESEARCH, 1996, 6 (10): : 986 - 994