The partner next door? The effect of micro-geographical proximity on intra-cluster inter-organizational relationships

被引:32
作者
Ferretti, Marco [1 ]
Guerini, Massimiliano [2 ]
Panetti, Eva [1 ]
Parmentola, Adele [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Napoli Parthenope, Dept Management & Quantitat Studies, Via Gen Parisi 32, I-80133 Naples, Italy
[2] Politecn Milan, Dept Management Econ & Ind Engn, Via Raffaele Lambruschini 4b, I-20156 Milan, Italy
关键词
Inter-organizational relationships; Knowledge transfer; Venture capital deals; High-tech clusters; Micro-geographical proximity; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; REGIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE NETWORKS; INSTITUTIONAL PROXIMITY; UNIVERSITY TECHNOLOGY; LOCALIZED KNOWLEDGE; STRATEGIC ALLIANCES; SPATIAL PROXIMITY; STRUCTURAL HOLES; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102390
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
120111 [工业工程];
摘要
Substantial research has focused on how innovation is influenced by geography from a macro perspective (e.g., at the country, state, or metropolitan level). However, less attention has been paid to how innovation is configured within a cluster from a micro perspective (e.g., at the district or firm level within a city), i.e., the "microgeographical proximity" within a cluster. With this paper, we aim to "zoom into" a technology cluster to study the role of the inter-organizational micro-geographical proximity for the establishment of knowledge transfer relationships. Specifically, we analyse whether and how the micro-geographical proximity is related to the formation of three different types of inter-organizational relationships: venture capital (VC) deals, intellectual property (IP) transfer agreements, and R&D strategic alliances. We take empirical evidence from the biopharma cluster in the Greater Boston Area. Our findings suggest the importance of micro-geographical proximity for the establishment of VC deals and IP transfer agreements, which emphasizes the importance of adopting a microgeographical perspective to highlight this "neighbourhood effect", which would not be possible when considering spatial proximity at the macro level.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 180 条
[91]
Harrison B., 1994, LEAN MEAN CHANGING L
[92]
Beyond Regional Clusters: On the Importance of Geographical Proximity for R&D Collaborations in a Global Economy-the Case of the Flemish Biotech Sector [J].
Herrmann, Andrea Monika ;
Taks, Janne Louise ;
Moors, Ellen .
INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION, 2012, 19 (06) :499-516
[93]
The geography of collaborative knowledge production in Europe [J].
Hoekman, Jarno ;
Frenken, Koen ;
van Oort, Frank .
ANNALS OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2009, 43 (03) :721-738
[94]
The effect of institutional proximity in non-local university-industry collaborations: An analysis based on Chinese patent data [J].
Hong, Wei ;
Su, Yu-Sung .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2013, 42 (02) :454-464
[95]
Network Capital, Social Capital and Knowledge Flow: How the Nature of Inter-organizational Networks Impacts on Innovation [J].
Huggins, Robert ;
Johnston, Andrew ;
Thompson, Piers .
INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION, 2012, 19 (03) :203-232
[96]
GEOGRAPHIC LOCALIZATION OF KNOWLEDGE SPILLOVERS AS EVIDENCED BY PATENT CITATIONS [J].
JAFFE, AB ;
TRAJTENBERG, M ;
HENDERSON, R .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1993, 108 (03) :577-598
[97]
The importance of spatial agglomeration in product innovation: A microgeography perspective [J].
Jang, Seongsoo ;
Kim, Jinwon ;
von Zedtwitz, Max .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2017, 78 :143-154
[98]
Proofs and prototypes for sale: The licensing of university inventions [J].
Jensen, R ;
Thursby, M .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (01) :240-259
[100]
Kale P, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P217, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<217::AID-SMJ95>3.3.CO